DC’s Black Lives Matter mural will be erased, but the idea can’t be

Black Lives Matter Plaza has orange traffic cones down the middle as work begins to transform it
|
Leah Millis/Reuters
Work begins to transform Black Lives Matter Plaza in Washington March 10 after threats by congressional Republicans to cut transportation funding if the plaza was not renamed.

If a Washington, D.C., mural was any indication, Black lives mattered for less than five years.

The same mayoral administration that commissioned a Black Lives Matter mural and plaza in June 2020, positioned just steps from the White House, called for their removal under pressure from the current presidential administration.

“The mural inspired millions of people and helped our city through a very painful period, but now we can’t afford to be distracted by meaningless congressional interference,” Mayor Muriel Bowser said in a statement on the social platform X.

Why We Wrote This

Under pressure from Congress and the Trump administration, Washington has begun to remove its Black Lives Matter mural. But the idea behind Black Lives Matter was never about murals, nor did it start with those words.

It felt like a concession speech. The decision is certainly just one small part of a larger trend. President Donald Trump and the Republican-led Congress are eager to dial back anything having to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or race consciousness. Even as, for instance, Columbia University in New York pushed back against the pro-Palestinian protests of its students, the Trump administration announced that it would cancel $400 million in grant funding.

But murals or morals were never the issue. To many, the mural seemed from the outset little more than a platitude in place of progress. What matters is the deeper message – that a mural to declare that Black lives matter was ever needed in the first place.

This has always been a challenge for lasting movements. How do people move past gestures of representation to something more concrete and powerful?

Some people might be tempted to compare the erasure of the Black Lives Matter mural and plaza in Washington to a metaphorical one across the United States. But such a comparison misses the mark.

Not only does it risk turning Black Lives Matter into a homogenous organization, but it is a disservice to the enduring power of the idea behind the movement.

An enduring truth

Even when the framers of the Constitution declared that enslaved people were three-fifths of a person, even when Supreme Court decisions like Dred Scott v. Sandford said that enslaved people were not citizens, Black Americans were five-fifths human and American. Their efforts to see that truth manifested is an indispensable link in American history. Neither the removal of a mural nor attempts to whitewash the past can change those facts.

The organization itself made that point forcefully in response to the news of the removal of the mural.

A street-level view of a plaza in Washington, D.C., in 2021 with large yellow letters that spell Black Lives Matter
Andrew Harnik/AP/File
How Black Lives Matter Plaza in Washington looked in 2021.

“First, they attacked critical race theory. Then, they banned books. Then DEI, now they’re erasing Black Lives Matter Plaza. Big mistake,” the organization wrote on X on March 5. “You can’t erase truth. Republicans hate that they have to walk past it. Hate that it reminds them of our power.”

“They can whitewash our murals, but they can’t erase our history,” the group added in a separate post. “Black Lives Matter is a permanent reminder of what they’re scared of and we’re not backing down.”

Black Lives Matter as an organization was founded in 2013 as a response to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s killer, George Zimmerman. It burned brightest after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020. As outrage mounted over the deaths of Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery, BLM was able to use the groundwork it had established years prior to create an international movement.

Beyond society’s ebbs and flows

In that moment, more than murals and marches took place. Perhaps most dramatically, calls to defund the police became an essential part of the conversations. But corporate America, too, took steps. At the height of BLM in 2020, Minneapolis-based Target offered this statement:

We are a community in pain. That pain is not unique to the Twin Cities – it extends across America. The murder of George Floyd has unleashed the pent-up pain of years, as have the killings of Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor. We say their names and hold a too-long list of others in our hearts. As a Target team, we’ve huddled, we’ve consoled, we’ve witnessed horrific scenes similar to what’s playing out now and wept that not enough is changing. And as a team we’ve vowed to face pain with purpose.

Months later, the company followed up with initiatives to “advance racial equality.” Those initiatives have since been revoked by Target as part of an anti-DEI pushback.

But the movement was never about corporatism, what BLM officials did with funding, or whether the protests went too far. At its core, it was always about affirming the lives of Africans, both here and abroad. The fact that there’s still such an uproar about that affirmation is itself a strong indicator of where America stands on cherishing Black lives. It is an indictment.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to DC’s Black Lives Matter mural will be erased, but the idea can’t be
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2025/0310/black-lives-matter-plaza-trump-dei
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe