Cuban Missile Crisis: the 3 most surprising things you didn't know

Fifty years ago, the Cuban Missile Crisis brought the United States and the Soviet Union within a hair’s breadth of nuclear war. Here are three things that many Americans don’t know about what historians routinely call “the most dangerous moment in human history.”

3. Nikita Khrushchev wasn’t an irrational warmonger

In the wake of the cable he received from Castro, Khrushchev was both alarmed and chastened, says Allyn. “Khrushchev was no more anxious to stumble into war than Kennedy,” he says.

Soon after receiving it, he “raced to broadcast over open radio the removal of the missiles from Cuba.”

In his cabled response to Castro, Khrushchev made clear his refusal to launch a preemptive strike on the US.

“You, of course, realize where that would have led,” Khrushchev wrote to Castro, according to Khrushchev’s memoirs. “Rather than a simple strike, it would have been the start of a thermonuclear war. Dear Comrade Fidel Castro, I consider this proposal of yours incorrect, although I understand your motivation.”

Castro never forgave the Soviets for publicly announcing the withdrawal of their missiles before even discussing it with him, and years later he denied Khrushchev’s son Sergei a visa to attend a Cuban Missile conference in Havana.

Allyn further argues in his book that the iconic moment in which Khrushchev banged his shoe on the desk during a United Nations meeting – cementing his reputation as a hothead – was an overblown misunderstanding. A journalist had stepped on his shoe in the hallway, but Khrushchev was self-conscious about his weight and “didn’t want to bend over to pick it up.”

A UN staffer delivered it to his desk. Then, during the General Assembly debate, there was a point where “one country insulted a Soviet satellite country and there was a huge ruckus,” Allyn says. “Khrushchev stood up to get the floor, because he had to respond to the insult.”

He waved first one hand, then the other. “The [UN] chairman didn’t see him, and the shoe was sitting conveniently on his desk,” Allyn says. “He actually tapped it; he didn’t bang it.”

Khrushchev was “an emotional, strong-minded individual who used graphic metaphors, but the stereotype of him as a hothead” was the product of the “propaganda war” that both countries waged during the cold war, Allyn says.

To this day, however, the most commonly asked question on the UN tour in New York, Allyn notes, is, “Where was Khrushchev sitting when he banged his shoe?”

3 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.