Syria chemical weapons inspectors shelter in Damascus after surviving ambush

The OPCW inspectors were investigating recent claims that the Syrian regime used chlorine gas on a rebel-held town. Although the chemical is not outright banned, its use in weapons is.

|
AP/File
A UN team of chemical weapons inspectors leaves their hotel in a convoy, in Damascus, Syria, August 26, 2013.

A daily roundup of terrorism and security issues.

An international team investigating reports of chlorine attacks in Syria is in Damascus after surviving an ambush in rebel-held territory on Tuesday.

Both the Syrian regime and rebel groups blamed each other for the attack, underscoring their bitter enmity and the difficulty of conducting international missions in Syria. The incident occurred less than a week before Syria's June 3 presidential election.  

The inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons were on a fact-finding mission to rebel-controlled Kafr Zita, where opposition groups accuse the regime of using chlorine gas against rebels and locals. The first vehicle in their convoy was hit by a roadside bomb, according to a press release from the organization:

Shortly after leaving government-controlled territory, the lead vehicle in the convoy was struck by an improvised explosive device (IED) sustaining severe damage. The team members were rescued and shifted to two other vehicles in the convoy which turned back to move to a safer location. While entering a built-up area the convoy was ambushed; the first vehicle was shot at from close range with automatic weapons hitting the body, windows and tires. 

The OPCW reports that it had negotiated a cease-fire between the regime and rebel groups before the fact-finding trip. After the ambush their inspectors were “briefly detained by some gunmen,” but released after “the intervention of the main opposition group with whom the ceasefire security arrangements had been negotiated,” the group says.

The Syrian Foreign Ministry first reported the attack and said that “terrorist groups,” a reference to rebel groups, had kidnapped the inspectors. Antigovernment groups responded that the government staged the attack so that the OPCW investigators would not reach the town, The New York Times reports.

The Violation Documentation Center, a Syrian NGO that monitors human rights abuses, has documented at least 14 suspected chemical attacks this year, reported The Christian Science Monitor’s Nicholas Blanford. This includes a “significant increase in April from explosive barrels dropped from helicopters,” many of which allegedly contained chlorine gas:

In recent weeks, the village of Kfar Zita in Hama Province was hit three times by barrel bombs dropped from helicopters, killing one and wounding 132 people. Video footage released by Syrian activists after the first attack on April 11 showed men, some of them convulsing, lying on the floor of a clinic struggling to breathe. Other videos showed unexploded yellow metal cylinders with the CL2 symbol for chlorine gas. Witnesses described smelling chlorine and seeing yellowish smoke wafting through the streets.

Chlorine gas reacts with moisture in the throat and lungs and turns into hydrochloric acid. In large concentrations it can be lethal. Chlorine gas bombs were used by insurgents in Iraq between 2006 and 2007, although with limited effect, and both the Germans and the British used it during World War I. 

The Chemical Weapons Convention does not specifically ban chlorine, a common industrial chemical, but its use as a weapon is outlawed under the convention’s “general purpose criterion,” reports Mr. Blanford.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Syria chemical weapons inspectors shelter in Damascus after surviving ambush
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/terrorism-security/2014/0528/Syria-chemical-weapons-inspectors-shelter-in-Damascus-after-surviving-ambush
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe