Mugabe nationalizes mines: Unlocking an industry or spurning trade partners?

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe announced diamond mining in the country would become a state monopoly. At risk is an increasingly important relationship with China. 

|
REUTERS/Philimon Bulawayo
Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe addresses supporters gathered to celebrate his 92nd birthday in Masvingo Feb. 27, 2016. Mr. Mugabe recently announced diamond mines in the country will be put under government control.

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe is set to nationalize the country’s diamond mines.

The 92-year-old leader declared Thursday that the Zimbabwean mines currently in operation would be taken over by the state. The news comes a week after the government ordered all mining companies in the country to halt work because they had not renewed their licenses.

President Mugabe alleged that the foreign mining companies were stealing billions from Zimbabwe. By running a state monopoly on mining, the country could control an industry with the potential to double its gross domestic product (GDP), according to estimates.

“Lots of smuggling and swindling has taken place and the companies that have been mining, I want to say robbed us of our wealth,” Mr Mugabe said to state broadcaster ZBC TV. “That is why we decided that this area should be a monopoly area and only the state should be able to do the mining in that area.”

During a two-hour interview with ZBC TV, Mugabe revealed that Zimbabwe had earned around $2 billion from the diamond mining operations. He estimated in total those operations are earning around $15 billion. No timeframe was included.

For a country with an annual GDP of around $14 billion, a state-run industry capable of generating $15 billion could be a major windfall. Zimbabwe was the eighth-largest diamond producer in the world in 2014, according to Kimberly Process, a diamond industry group. Although production fell during 2015 to 420,000 carats from 660,000, according to Bloomberg.

Despite the potential for billions in earning, the move also risks alienating foreign investors.

One of the mining companies facing closure if Mugabe’s plan for a state monopoly succeeds is Anjin Investments. The Chinese-run company has challenged Mugabe’s order in court, according to Reuters. Whether the monopoly will impact Chinese-Zimbabwean relations is not yet known.

China is Zimbabwe’s largest trading partner. Added to the trade deals, Zimbabwe also agreed to adopt the Chinese yuan as its national currency after China canceled millions in debts. China is the biggest market for diamonds after the US, according to Bloomberg.

So far, Mugabe has downplayed the possibility the state seizure will complicate relations with China.

“I don’t think it has affected any of our relations at all,” Mugabe told ZBC. “I told President Xi Jinping that we were not getting much from the company, and we didn’t like it anymore in this country.”

Past efforts to spur the economy by Mugabe have been heavily criticized. In 2000, the president seized farmland from hundreds of white farmers to redistribute it – a move that was credited for having disastrous effects on Zimbabwe's agriculture industry. At the time, commercial farming provided 40 percent of the country's export earnings, according to The Guardian.

The seizure also made foreign investors wary, which could mitigate damage to the mining industry.

"I suspect this won't really have broad implications across the industry because Zimbabwe is a known, risky jurisdiction to operate in," said John Turner, head of the mining group Fasken Martineau, a law firm that works with miners in Africa, to Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Mugabe nationalizes mines: Unlocking an industry or spurning trade partners?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0304/Mugabe-nationalizes-mines-Unlocking-an-industry-or-spurning-trade-partners
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe