Falklands War 30th Anniversary: 5 British and Argentine papers react

April 2, 2012 marks the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War, which lasted less than three months but claimed the lives of more than 900 soldiers.  Here are five reactions from Argentine and British newspapers on the anniversary of the Falkland Islands War:

A war that never should have begun

El Dia (in Spanish)
A war that never should have begun and Argentina’s rights to the Malvinas
Editorial

“The 30 years we mark today since the beginning of the Malvinas war reopens one of the most painful wounds in Argentina’s collective memory....

...The war against Great Britain was a military decision, made by a military clique, that didn’t take into consideration manpower, context, or outcome. It was an absurd war, paid for with the blood of our men and with many years of international isolation and distrust. But it was a complex process because it dealt with the unfaltering believe that many Argentines held close: Over the course of  more than a century we never forgot that the Falklands belonged to our territory.... [The fallen soldiers], of course, had no choice in whether they went to war, but they were willing to give their lives for their fatherland.
 
It is known that Britain is the power that year after year, doesn’t respect UN resolutions and encouragement to resume negotiations and find ways toward a mutual resolution....

Some 30 years after that painful and traumatic experience [of the Falklands War], Argentina should strengthen its work and dedication to claim the full recognition of the sovereignty of the islands through diplomatic channels and international forums. The only way to achieve this will be to never divert from the path of diplomatic negotiations and to put all of our energy into this. Only then, when we reach that goal through these channels, will those who died fighting this war be truly honored.”

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.