Skip to footer

Did Nigeria massacre innocents and call them 'Boko Haram'?

A killing of insurgents in northern Nigeria may have actually been a heinous attack on local young men merely rounded up and detained, according to a New York Times account. 

|
AP
Local residents move around the streets as smoke rises from the nearby Giwa Military barracks following an alleged attack by suspected Islamist militants in Maiduguri, Nigeria, March, 14, 2014. Now, there is a report that the Nigerian military killed young men at the barracks and later announced it was an escape attempt by militants in custody.
  • By John Campbell Guest blogger

A version of this post appeared on Africa in Transition. The views expressed are the author's own. 

On March 14, insurgents labeled “Boko Haram” attacked the Giwa Barracks, a major army facility in the northern Nigerian city of Maiduguri.

At the time, Nigerian military spokesmen said that a significant number of “Boko Haram” members were killed.

However, in a horrific article in the March 21 New York Times, Adam Nossiter reports that the victims of the killing spree outside the gates of the Giwa Barracks were young men who had previously been indiscriminately rounded up and detained in Giwa Barracks without charge. 

According to the Army story, “Boko Haram” allegedly managed to break into the heavily fortified military installation, release those imprisoned -- and then the attackers and the detained were killed as they fled. The military attacked with both aircraft and soldiers on the ground.

It should be noted that the military identifies the assailants as “Boko Haram,” but no spokesman for Boko Haram has claimed responsibility. It is also unclear how such a powerful facility could be breached so easily. 

Mr. Nossiter cites credible local non-governmental organizations who place the casualty numbers as high as one thousand. If that is correct, the March 14 death toll is the highest ever for a single day.

Nossiter also quotes the senator from Maiduguri, Ahmed Zanna: “When they [the detainees] went out of the barracks, that is when gunfire was opened on them. And that is how most of them died. Yes, they bombed the detainees.”

Nossiter also quotes the senator as saying “90 to 95 percent of the detainees were innocent people. They were just rounding up people. People were just rounded up and taken into custody.” He also said “they [the military] managed to eliminate those who were in detention. The whole episode is to kill the inmates. That’s all.”

In the past, Western media, including the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, has reported that the army detained large numbers of young men without charge at Giwa Barracks under horrific conditions. 

Because it is so difficult to tell who is “Boko Haram” and who is not, the military and security services appear to be highly indiscriminate in whom they arrest.

Such an atrocity as apparently took place at Giwa Barracks will undermine support for the Abuja government -- and perhaps for Nigeria’s so-called “democracy.” To me, it is noteworthy that Senator Zanna, likely an established member of the northern Nigerian establishment, has been so outspoken.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Did Nigeria massacre innocents and call them 'Boko Haram'?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2014/0324/Did-Nigeria-massacre-innocents-and-call-them-Boko-Haram
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe