Blocking Pacific trade deal means 'handing the keys' to China, official says

Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are against the Pacific trade deal. But the US trade representative still thinks it will pass Congress. 

|
Nicolas Asfouri/Reuters/File
US Trade Representative Michael Froman (l.) meets with Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang in Beijing June 6.

United States Trade Representative Michael Froman argues a trade deal opposed by both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton will have enough bipartisan support to clear Congress this year and thus help shape the forces of globalization in a way that benefits American workers. 

“Everything in this city is impossible until it is inevitable,” Ambassador Froman quipped at the end of a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters where he discussed the Trans Pacific Partnership. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a sweeping trade agreement that would reduce trade barriers between the US and 11 other Pacific Rim nations.

Froman faces formidable challenges in gaining congressional approval for the pact. Mr. Trump has called TPP a “death blow for American manufacturing” and promised to withdraw from the deal. Mrs. Clinton said that if she were president, the US would say “no to unfair trade deals ... including the Trans Pacific Partnership.”

Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky said this week that “chances are pretty slim” that the Senate will take the measure up this year.

President Obama sees TPP has a key portion of his legacy, and Froman calls it “the most concrete manifestation of our rebalancing strategy towards Asia.”

The Trade Representative admits that wage stagnation and income inequality have created a lot of economic anxiety among voters. Since the public cannot vote on the forces of automation and economic globalization, the focus turns to trade deals where Congress has a vote, he said. 

“Trade agreements have become a scapegoat for much of what else is going on in the economy, a vessel into which people pour their legitimate economic anxieties that are largely caused by other factors,” Froman said.

A major argument in favor of trade agreements, he said, was that they “are how you shape globalization to make sure the global economy works for Americas workers, farmers, ranchers, businesses” by establishing rules of the road. 

When pressed on what made him think TPP could clear Congress after the election, Froman said that in his discussions with members “we are getting a very good response on the substance of the agreement.” He mentioned spending “a lot of my time” with rank-and-file House Republicans. “As you walk through the agreement and talk about the benefits to their constituents, they are quite responsive and understand both what the benefits are moving forward and what the costs are” of not acting.  

A recent study by the Peterson Institute of International Economics estimated the cost of postponing TPP adoption for one year would be $94 billion or the equivalent of a $700 tax on every US household as a result of lost export sales. 

The nation’s top trade official also argued that Congress will face a stark choice regarding China. “At the end of the day, I don’t think Congress is going to want to be responsible for handing the keys of the castle over to China,” Froman said. 

He noted that China is executing on a regional strategy expanding its economic influence in the Pacific Rim. “The question is whether we are going to execute on our regional strategy … and whether we are going to be able deliver on the commitments we have made to our partners in the region or whether we are going to cede that ground to China.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Blocking Pacific trade deal means 'handing the keys' to China, official says
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/monitor_breakfast/2016/0714/Blocking-Pacific-trade-deal-means-handing-the-keys-to-China-official-says
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe