Debt ceiling 101: 12 questions about what's going on

The US Treasury has warned that as early as Oct. 17 it will no longer be able to cover all the government's rising financial obligations. Here’s your guide to the debt limit deadline and its implications.

6. Is the national debt out of control?

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf is reflected on a table as he speaks about the office's annual Budget and Economic Outlook during a news conference in February in Washington.

It’s fair to say that the US has deep fiscal challenges. There is some good news that Obama trumpets: Federal deficits are falling, and the Congressional Budget Office says the national debt promises to stay roughly stable as a percentage of GDP during the next decade. All that, coupled with fact of historically low interest rates on Treasury bonds argues against the notion of a near-term fiscal crisis.

But economists don’t view this as a time to be complacent, either.

The debt already equals a full year’s GDP, which is a very high level compared with most of US history. Many economists would prefer to see a level of 60 or even 30 percent of GDP. And without a course correction, the current path doesn’t lead there. Instead, it leads to a steady rise in debt after 2023. That’s mainly because the nation’s changing demographics push up the cost of entitlement programs such as Medicare.

If a nation’s debt keeps rising higher, it could signal an unsustainable course. The risk grows that America will lose standing as a magnet for global investment. Interest rates could rise and economic growth could slow, so that living standards grow at a slower pace. At a minimum, a high debt-to-GDP ratio leaves a nation little cushion for emergencies.

6 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.