Paul O'Neal video: Did Chicago police violate the new shooting policy?

The video shows Chicago officers fired at a fleeing Jaguar convertible, an apparent violation of a new department policy. 

|
hicago Police Department/Independent Police Review Authority via AP
A Chicago police officer fires into a stolen car driven by Paul O'Neal on July 28, 2016, in Chicago. The body cam was the first video the city released under a new policy that calls for such images to be released within 60 days.

Chicago tried to introduce reforms into its police department. It appointed a new police superintendent this spring, revised its policies, and quickly pulled the badges of the three officers that fired at an unarmed black teenager, killing Paul O’Neal July 28.

But, body-camera videos from the shooting suggest the city's actual policing practices haven't caught up to these publicized reforms.

The videos the Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA) released Friday show the three officers fired 15 times at the stolen convertible Mr. O’Neal, 18, was driving, an apparent violation of department policy. The officers’ remarks to each after the shooting, as Mr. O’Neal lays handcuffed and dying on the ground, indicate they fired at the teenager even though they were unsure he was armed.

The images, the first to be released under a new department policy that requires videos of an officer-involved shooting be released within 60 days, are part of Chicago’s efforts to be more transparent, as the US Justice Department investigates it for allegations that it systematically violating citizens’ rights. But, some argue the videos show the department has a way to go before its policing syncs with these reforms.

"This goes down to training on race, this goes down to training on the community," Attorney Michael Oppenheimer, who has sued the department on behalf of the O’Neal family, told The Chicago Tribune. "There's a lot that needs to be done. Some of it has been done. We have a long way to go."

The clash between Mr. O’Neal and police occurred July 28, when the department says he was chased into the South Side neighborhood in a stolen Jaguar convertible. The video shows that after O’Neal crashed into one police SUV and a parked vehicle, two officers fired 15 shots in about five seconds in the direction of a second police cruiser. O’Neal then collides with the second cruiser, and flees on foot. A third officer chases O’Neal. About 20 seconds after the crash, five shots can be heard. The body-camera of the officer who chased O’Neal was not turned on when he is said to have shot O’Neal in the back. The camera turned on afterward, while the officers handcuffed O'Neal.  

Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, a pair of “fresh eyes” Mayor Rahm Emanuel appointed in the spring, said the day after the shooting that it “appears that departmental policies may have been violated.” Because the investigation into the incident is ongoing, police are prohibited from commenting on which policy was violated. In 2015, the department revised its use-of-force policy to prohibit firing on a moving vehicle if it was the only threat against the officers or others.

In the body-camera video, with O’Neal on the ground, one officer says he shot at the car after it almost hit one of the other officers. The officer who said he believed he shot O’Neal said he thought he heard shots come from the Jaguar during the pursuit. He acknowledged he fired without knowing if O’Neal was armed.

A police spokesman said the agency would take a "hard look" at the training and tactics at play in the incident, according to the Tribune.

As the Justice Department investigates the city’s policing practices, Mayor Emanuel and Johnson has attempted to reform the department. In addition to the appointment of Mr. Johnson, Emanuel instituted all officers wear body-cameras. However, the effectiveness of these cameras in improving police practices are up for debate.

The Justice Department has said cameras can improve policing and a department's relationship with the community. 

“Body-worn cameras hold tremendous promise for enhancing transparency, promoting accountability, and advancing public safety for law enforcement officers and the communities they serve,” said Attorney General Loretta Lynch last spring, while she announced $23.2 million in grants to aid smaller police departments to buy body cameras.

But a new study of 50 police departments found that the rules that govern camera use, in particular who sees the videos, are more important than just introducing cameras.  

“Body cameras are only a step in the right direction,” Chad Marlow of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) told The Christian Science Monitor, “if their use is governed by principles.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Paul O'Neal video: Did Chicago police violate the new shooting policy?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0806/Paul-O-Neal-video-Did-Chicago-police-violate-the-new-shooting-policy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe