US hope for Ukraine elections: a government Russia can't just dismiss

Ukraine wants a large turnout Sunday, especially in the restive east, to give the new government legitimacy. So do the US and Europe. But Russia is already puncturing holes in the election process.

|
Efrem Lukatsky/AP
Ukrainian presidential candidate Petro Poroshenko speaks to his supporters during a rally in Uman, Ukraine, Tuesday. Ukraine holds a presidential election Sunday.

Ever since Ukraine’s former pro-Russia President Viktor Yanukovych was run out of the country by pro-Western protesters in February, Russia has referred to the interim government in Kiev as an unelected “junta.”

So the US and other Western backers of a stable and democratic Ukraine are looking to Sunday’s presidential election to give the country a leadership reflecting the will of the Ukrainian people and whose legitimacy can’t be easily dismissed.

It could be a tall order, however. While the western bulk of the country is peaceful and ready for balloting, the eastern industrial provinces where separatists have taken hold have seen renewed violence in recent days. Voting in several self-proclaimed independent “republics” is looking problematic at best.

Still, if Ukraine can pull off a largely “national” election that thousands of international observers in the country deem to be fair and free, that will go a long way to giving the country a legitimate government that the West can assist political and economically, and Russia cannot easily dismiss, regional experts say.

“The question is really what Ukraine needs from these elections, and that’s a large turnout that reflects as much as possible turnout from throughout the country, and voting that the thousands of observers in the country deem to be fair and free,” says Lee Feinstein, senior fellow in transatlantic relations at the German Marshall Fund in Washington. “If the elections are carried out in such a way that gives additional legitimacy to new Ukrainian government, that’s the most important thing.”

A key factor determining the election’s success will be Russia. The world will be watching closely for “evidence” that Russia is not acting to interfere, Mr. Feinstein says, “not trying to depress turnout or to actively encourage [the separatists] in the east.”

US senior officials are calling on Russia to exercise its influence in the east and pressure the pro-Russia separatists to allow the democratic process to take place. But Russia, while claiming it supports Sunday’s election, is also expressing strong doubts that the outcome can be considered truly “national” when security operations targeting the separatists are under way.

“What’s at stake here is whether or not Russia is going to decide to respect the right of Ukrainians to be able to decide their future,” Secretary of State John Kerry said earlier this week.

The US is also underscoring the large number of international election observers in Ukraine. Ukrainian officials claim that more than 200 election commissions are “up and running” across the country, even in some of the separatist strongholds.

“Even in Donetsk and Luhansk, 23 of 34 district election commissions are functioning despite the difficult environment,” said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki on Wednesday. She also noted that the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the principal forum for dialogue between Western and Eastern Europe, has 1,000 election monitors in Ukraine.  

Russian officials, on the other hand, are sounding less optimistic about the election’s prospects. “Obviously, election of the head of state is a step in the right direction,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said Thursday. “But it is vital to ensure that these elections are really nationwide,” he said, adding that an election is “hard to imagine” with “punitive operations” under way in several regions.

Not just Ukrainians, but the region – and American credibility and influence in it – have a lot riding on Sunday’s elections, some Europe analysts say. “Free and fair elections are only the first, but absolute necessary, step on Ukraine’s way toward stability and prosperity,” says Michal Baranowski, director of the Warsaw office of the German Marshall Fund.

The elections, he adds, are “also a test of Western resolve" to “show whether the EU and the United States can hold Russia to its promise not to provoke violence and let the democratic process take place throughout Ukraine.”

Feinstein says a successful election can be a “pivot point” that leads to a more stable Ukraine and a fresh, legitimate government that can begin to tackle Ukraine’s daunting problems. Such a government, he adds, is one the US and the European Union “will be able to offer more robust economic and political support,” something he says will be key to the country’s future path.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US hope for Ukraine elections: a government Russia can't just dismiss
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2014/0523/US-hope-for-Ukraine-elections-a-government-Russia-can-t-just-dismiss
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe