Meryl Streep, Tommy Lee Jones in 'Hope Springs': movie review

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Hope Springs' revives a tired boomer marriage.

|
Courtesy of Sony Pictures
'Hope Springs' leads Tommy Lee Jones (l.) and Meryl Streep (r.) do as well as they can with their material.

Kay (Meryl Streep) and Arnold (Tommy Lee Jones) have been married for 31 years, and the juice has long gone out of their marriage. Stolid and oblivious Arnold, an Omaha accountant, doesn’t seem to mind much.

Kay, on the other hand, is so desperate to have a real marriage again that she does the near-unthinkable: Using her own savings, she enrolls in a week-long couples-therapy program in Great Hope Springs, Maine, conducted by bestselling psychiatrist Dr. Feld (Steve Carell). Mulishly resistant, Arnold at the last minute agrees to go along.

This is the setup for the rather annoyingly titled drama-comedy “Hope Springs,” and without Streep and Jones, the film might have devolved into a glorified self-help gabfest. Dr. Feld’s sessions are not played for laughs, despite Carell’s participation, and his therapyese can sound awfully glib at times. But Streep and Jones work hard to extricate themselves from the film’s middlebrow trappings. That they almost succeed is a tribute to sheer talent.

Streep last worked for director David Frankel in “The Devil Wears Prada,” where she played a viperish, whispery fashion magazine editor who was about as far removed from Kay as you can get. Kay is a woman who, even while miserable, which is most of the time, sticks to the niceties. There are no scenes in “Hope Springs” where she shrieks at Arnold or threatens to leave him. More than anything else, she is bewildered by what has happened to her marriage, and it’s not entirely clear from Vanessa Taylor’s screenplay (her first) if the marriage was ever all that great.

What Kay is hoping to get from the therapy sessions is more than just sexual renewal with her husband, who has slept apart from her for years. She wants to know she is, in the deepest sense, needed. It’s to Streep’s immense credit that she doesn’t wring every last drop of pathos from her scenes. The sadness comes through without special pleading.

Because Kay is such a recessive personality, Streep’s performance may be almost too much of a good thing. She doesn’t play full-out and that can seem like a diminution of her talent. But her acting here is inseparable from Jones’s, and his bullying orneriness counterbalances her civility.

Each performance needs the other to work.

Jones, nevertheless, is the film’s fulcrum. It is Arnold, and not Kay, who undergoes the greatest emotional transformation, and, even though the screenplay is often too pat, Jones gets inside the innards of this man who is both deeply content and deeply unhappy. There is a heartbreaking scene where Arnold gets up the gumption to romance Kay in high style (which, for him, means actually spending some money on her), and we can see the iceberg looming in the near distance. Despite the relatively skimpy material, Jones and Streep are so good together, they plumb so many emotional levels, that I often found myself wishing that the Ingmar Bergman of “Scenes From a Marriage” had stepped in to shake things up.

These two deserve the best, and “Hope Springs,” which is saddled with one of those infernal scores telling you just how to feel, isn’t it.

But if the film doesn’t really explore the pain and bitterness of this marriage, it’s still leagues ahead of most such attempts. Not that there have been very many. Most Hollywood relationship movies feature protagonists who haven’t yet seen 30. In the geezer sweepstakes, it may be that “Hope Springs” is the best we can hope for these days from Hollywood. Or maybe, if it’s a hit, it will open the way for more daring movies about boomer intimacy. There’s certainly a ready audience for them. Grade: B (Rated PG-13 for mature thematic content involving sexuality.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Meryl Streep, Tommy Lee Jones in 'Hope Springs': movie review
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2012/0808/Meryl-Streep-Tommy-Lee-Jones-in-Hope-Springs-movie-review
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe