Skip to footer

'The X-Files': Was the original show an early sign of the decline of the time slot?

The 1990s incarnation of 'X-Files' aired on Friday nights yet succeeded anyway. As DVRs maintain their popularity and viewers have multiple online options for catching up with a show later, viewers today are finding shows even if the programs air at an unusual time.

|
Ed Araquel/Fox/AP
'The X-Files' stars David Duchovny (l.) and Gillian Anderson (r.).

The hit Fox science fiction series “The X-Files” returns for six episodes beginning Jan. 24. 

“X-Files,” which stars David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson, premiered in 1993 and became popular with viewers, spawning multiple movies.

The newest incarnation of the show is being billed as an “event series” by its network. 

The original version of the show centered on possible paranormal and alien happenings. FBI agent Mulder (Duchovny) was receptive to these happenings, while his comrade Scully (Anderson) was a bit more doubtful. 

The program is often credited with having succeeded despite its time slot. “X-Files” premiered on Friday nights and aired there for its first three seasons. Friday nights are now almost written off by broadcast networks, with Alan Sepinwall of HitFix recalling of "X-Files" debuting, “[Friday] was still not the place you schedule anything with high hopes for.” 

Gary Newman, former vice president of business affairs at Fox, agreed, recalling in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter, “Friday was bigger back then, but it still wasn't a place where you put a show you really believed in.”

Yet “X-Files” became a hit, with ratings increasing in a way that suggested the show was getting popular through word-of-mouth. Despite the time at which it aired, fans found it. “The audience kept growing,” former Fox director of drama development Danielle Gelber told the Hollywood Reporter. 

“X-Files” is far from the first or the last show to succeed despite its initial timeslot. But the fact that an unpromising air time didn’t affect the fortunes of “X-Files” echoes the current lack of importance the time at which a TV show goes on the air can have. 

DVRs exist: enough said. The numbers of viewers who tune in later using that or a similar device are counted in ratings now as networks try to calculate exactly who was watching a certain program. 

And counting these numbers can make a major difference. The Starz show “Outlander,” which scored a nomination for the best drama TV series Golden Globe and concluded its first season this past May, airs on Saturday nights, a time that New York Times reporter Bill Carter wrote has “long been the loneliest night of the week in the television business.”

For its midseason premiere, the show drew more than 1.22 million viewers, but when those who watched it on Sunday were added, the network found that 1.16 million viewers tuned in the day after, effectively doubling the show’s ratings. 

Like "X-Files," this Starz show is succeeding despite airing during a time that would have been thought of as less than ideal in the old TV world.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to 'The X-Files': Was the original show an early sign of the decline of the time slot?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0121/The-X-Files-Was-the-original-show-an-early-sign-of-the-decline-of-the-time-slot
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe