'The X-Files' six-show series: Why the broadcast TV shift to a shorter season?

Following the example of cable networks and streaming services, broadcast networks have been shortening the seasons of TV shows, including the upcoming six-episode run of 'The X-Files.' Is it working?

|
Mario Anzuoni/Reuters
'The X-Files' stars Gillian Anderson (l.) and David Duchovny (r.).

The Fox science fiction series “The X-Files” returns for a six-episode run later this month.

Is a shorter season better?  The answer seems to depend on the show and who you ask: The audience, critics, or sponsors. 

The X-Files six-episode length is part of a trend in broadcast TV of cutting down on season or series lengths. Cable networks and streaming services both air shorter seasons than a traditional broadcast season of, say, 22 episodes. For example, HBO’s hit show “Game of Thrones” airs 10 episodes a season, while Netflix’s program “Orange Is the New Black” usually airs 13 installments.

And so programs like “Heroes Reborn,” NBC’s revival of its mid-2000s superhero show “Heroes,” and ABC’s anthology series “American Crime” go on the air with seasons consisting of 13 episodes and 11 episodes, respectively. “X-Files” is airing for even fewer installments.

It seems reasonable to assume that in the age of the dominance of networks like HBO and Netflix, broadcast networks may have been inspired by their example when ordering episodes. 

There are other benefits, too. As noted by Jethro Nededog of Business Insider, networks can get big stars for a new show on board more easily with a shorter run. HBO exemplified this with the first season of "True Detective," which starred Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson and which earned both actors Emmy nominations.

And networks can hopefully hang on to audiences by airing short seasons of original shows rather than airing reruns during traditionally sleepy TV times like the summer.

With shows like “X-Files” and “Heroes,” the scheduling move may also be a response to such past hit shows as the ABC mid-2000s hit “Lost.” “Lost” aired for six seasons consisting of around 20 episodes, a typical network length. But some viewers complained that those behind the program waited too long into the run to reveal answers to the science fiction show’s mysteries. 

In creating short versions of sci-fi shows, such as X-Files, networks are most likely trying to appease viewers wary of investing time in a long-running show that they feel won't provide answers. 

Has shortening their seasons helped the networks create new hits? 

“American Crime” was a hit with reviewers and was recently nominated for various Golden Globes. Ratings declined as the first season went on and the season two premiere earlier this month was about the same size audience as it had at the end of season one, so we'll see how the new episodes do with viewers.

Meanwhile, “Heroes Reborn” was not well-received critically and viewership has decreased as the show has gone on. In this case, it seems that the answer is fairly simple: Shorter isn't better if the show isn’t creatively engaging or tries to do too much. Ken Tucker of Yahoo TV wrote of the program, "The problem with 'Heroes Reborn' is that it’s got a lot of subplots... but all of these characters end up doing the same thing."

So does running fewer episodes benefit “X-Files”?

Judging by early reviews, the answer seems to be no. The original “X-Files” show was known for its detailed universe and some critics say that six episodes may not be enough to answer the questions raised by the new show and that the shortened season means that characters spend a lot of time explaining the story.

Tim Goodman of the Hollywood Reporter called the first episode of the show "tedious... Why... only give six episodes when the series famously couldn’t explain its larger mysteries in hundreds of episodes?... [Creator Chris] Carter’s dialogue is prone to exposition (again, partly the result of only having six episodes to work with) and overheated soliloquies."

And Ben Travers of Indiewire wrote of the premiere, "So much is said, so many pieces are put in motion, and so little of it actually holds the meaning for the audience."

However, it's early days yet for "X-Files" and we have yet to see how viewers respond to the new installments.

And as cable and streaming continue to succeed with these short seasons, broadcast networks most likely won't back away from this experiment just yet.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'The X-Files' six-show series: Why the broadcast TV shift to a shorter season?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0113/The-X-Files-six-show-series-Why-the-broadcast-TV-shift-to-a-shorter-season
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe