Skip to footer

A look at the original iPad prototype

Thanks to some legal actions, photos of "Prototype 035" -- possibly Apple's first iPad mockup -- were recently made public. Prototype 035, made between 2002 and 2004, is clunky by today's standards but shares a lot of design elements with the modern iPad.

|
NetworkWorld
Images recently made public show an Apple tablet with rounded corners, a thick body, and a plastic back. This prototype, made between 2002 and 2004, was probably the basis for the iPad.

The iPad's appearance hasn't changed much since it was first introduced in 2010. Sure, the latest version has more power under the hood than the original, but the physical design has been more or less static. The iPad didn't just spring into existence as a 9.7-inch screen with a 4:3 aspect ratio and a home button; there had to be some earlier versions of the tablet that didn't make the cut, right?

Thanks to the ongoing patent disputes between Samsung and Apple, we've now got an idea of what the very earliest iPad mockup looked like. Tech site NetworkWorld uncovered some photos that were recently made public in a legal action, which show an early tablet model called "Prototype 035."

The device, created sometime between 2002 and 2004, is quite a bit taller and wider than the iPad we know today, and looks to be almost an inch thick. It's got a white plastic back that hearkens back to Apple's iBook line of laptops, and a headphone port on one corner. There's no home button, but the photos do show the now-ubiquitous 30-pin dock connector found on iPhones, iPads, and all but the earliest iPods. (The dock connector wasn't introduced until 2003, but Apple could've had the design nailed down in 2002, early enough to appear in this prototype.)

MSNBC notes that the photos were likely the basis for a tablet patent that Apple filed in March 2004. That means Apple was probably working on this proto-iPad before they shifted their focus to the iPhone. In a separate deposition, recorded in December 2011, Apple chief designer Jonathan Ive refers to the photos and says he remembers this prototype as "one of the models that we made as part of the design process, as part of the exploration."

For all its early-2000s clunkiness, it's remarkable how much Prototype 035 looks like the iPad we know today. There's the rounded edges, the black bezel surrounding the screen . . . even the familiar Apple logo centered on the back. It may have been intended to run a modified version of the Mac OS X desktop operating system, since iOS was still years away.

These photos help give context to some remarks Steve Jobs gave at the 2010 All Things D conference. At the time, he mentioned, "It began with the tablet. I had this idea about having a glass display, a multitouch display you could type on with your fingers." Jobs recounted having a semi-functional tablet in his hands and realizing, " 'My God, we can build a phone with this!' So we put the tablet aside, and we went to work on the iPhone."

We've now got a better sense of the design process that pushed Apple to pursue building its own phone before circling back around to the tablet years later.

Readers, what do you think about Prototype 035? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to A look at the original iPad prototype
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/Horizons/2012/0719/A-look-at-the-original-iPad-prototype
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe