Exoplanets: Why Titan's haze clouds prognosis for studying alien atmospheres

Astronomers looking for exoplanets that support life have eagerly anticipated improved analyses of their atmospheres. But observations of Saturn's moon Titan suggest haze and dust could pose a problem.

|
NASA/AP
This undated true color image by the Cassini spacecraft released by NASA shows Saturn's largest moon, Titan, passing in front of the planet and its rings.

With more than 1,400 extrasolar planets neatly listed in their catalogs, astronomers have been hailing a shift from merely hunting for planets to getting first glimpses of what their atmospheres are like – a key step toward finding planets that could host life elsewhere in the galaxy.

Observations of Saturn's moon Titan, however, are hinting that dust or haze in the atmospheres of distant planets may provide a greater stumbling block to the highly anticipated observations than theorists might have thought.

The results from Titan suggest that for many exoplanets, haze could thwart the detection of all but the most abundant gases an atmosphere contains, gases that may only hint at far more interesting chemistry taking place below the haze layer. In other cases, haze may prevent researchers from taking meaningful measurements of an extrasolar planet's atmosphere at all.

“We're beginning to get some kind of understanding" of the gases present in the atmospheres of some exoplanets, says Tyler Robinson, who led a team of US and French astronomers that performed the observations of Titan.

"But the observations are very difficult to take and the tendency is to over-interpret them," he says. By focusing on data from Titan's atmosphere, gathered by the Cassini spacecraft as the moon transits the sun, "I was looking for an opportunity to help shed some light on what we might one day see on exoplanets."

The transit technique is used to analyze the atmospheres of extrasolar planets. Using it on Titan could make Saturn’s moon a testbed to ensure that the models used to interpret data from extrasolar planets work on "something we understand really well before we go and explore the unknown," Dr. Robinson says.

Researchers generally make their measurements of an extrasolar planet's atmosphere as the planet passes in front of its host star. This backlights the atmosphere and allows scientists to gather spectra that carry information about molecules contained in the atmosphere.

Clouds on a planet could block such measurements. But some researchers have calculated that clouds wouldn't appear above altitudes where a planet's atmospheric pressure is less than one-thousandth of that on the Earth’s surface – comparable to the pressure at an altitude of 30 miles on Earth, about halfway to space. So in principle, above that altitude, researchers should be able to still gather useful information on the composition of a planet's atmosphere.

But what about haze, something in ample supply on Titan? Haze has thwarted researchers trying to probe the atmospheres of mini-Neptunes, Robinson notes.

Robinson and his colleagues mapped the distribution of haze in Titan's atmosphere and its effect on gathering spectra as the moon transited the sun.

The haze was present at far higher altitudes than those projected for clouds on exoplanets, which meant that spectra gathered from a hazy atmosphere during a planet's transit carried a high risk of being unreliable indicators of the chemistry deep in the planets' atmospheres.

On Titan, methane is so abundant in the moon's atmosphere that it stood out against the lackluster spectrum from the haze itself. But the team found that the haze "had a dramatic effect" on the spectra overall. The haze's obscuring signature was at least as strong as the signatures of other gases of interest that are present but at far lower concentrations than methane.

The results appear in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Some help will come from measurements made as a transiting planet swings behind its host star, Robinson adds.

Before a planet vanishes in this "secondary transit," its atmosphere's spectrum becomes much less sensitive to haze because an observer is in effect looking straight down into the atmosphere. During a primary transit, when the planet eclipses its star, the star's light has to travel a longer way through the atmosphere. Dust that may look tenuous from directly overhead looks like a thick cloud when viewed along this longer path.

Researchers are quick to point out that data on extrasolar-planet atmospheres gathered so far have required astronomers to push their detectors to their limits.

That in itself is a useful exercise, notes Adam Burrows, an astrophysicist at Princeton University in New Jersey.

In an opinion article published in January in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, he outlined the formidable scientific challenges to producing reliable information about the atmospheres of extrasolar planets.

Current observations and the theories that help interpret them "are just not robust enough to survive intact into the future," he wrote.

Still, he remains optimistic in this face of this most challenging effort humans have ever undertaken in planetary remote sensing, he added. Current efforts in effect represent the training wheels. And if the history of exoplanet detections is any guide, the research community may achieve its goals far faster than they initially thought as they find unanticipated ways to improve the performance of their hardware and uncover new tools for interpreting what they observe.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Exoplanets: Why Titan's haze clouds prognosis for studying alien atmospheres
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/0530/Exoplanets-Why-Titan-s-haze-clouds-prognosis-for-studying-alien-atmospheres
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe