2022
June
10
Friday

Monitor Daily Podcast

June 10, 2022
Loading the player...
Peter Grier
Washington editor

I’ve attended, watched, or read the transcript of countless congressional hearings in my decades as a journalist.

But I’ve never encountered anything like Thursday night’s hearing of the U.S. House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

It wasn’t boring. Committee members didn’t all make opening statements aimed at voters back home. There weren’t rounds of questioning where the questions took up most of a member’s allotted time.

It was gripping, in fact. As promised, the committee honed months of work into a narrative that there was a coordinated attempt to stop the transfer of power to President-elect Joe Biden, with then-President Donald Trump at its heart.

One of the narrative’s key themes was that much of Mr. Trump’s inner circle was aware that claims of “election fraud” were false, and told him so. “I did not agree with saying the election was stolen,” said former Attorney General Bill Barr in a taped deposition. 

Another was that some things that didn’t happen were as important as things that did. Mr. Trump made no call to anyone asking for the Capitol to be defended. Vice President Mike Pence – trapped inside – did.

“Pence issued ... unambiguous orders,” said Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley in his deposition.

A third theme was that the Capitol insurrection was an organized assault by extremist groups who claimed they had been called to action by Mr. Trump. 

“It was a war scene,” said witness Caroline Edwards, a member of the Capitol Police injured in the riot.

The hearing drew a quick response from the former president on his Truth Social network.

“The so-called ‘Rush on the Capitol’ was not caused by me, it was caused by a Rigged and Stolen Election!” he posted.

Other Republicans said the narrative was old news and would make no difference to voters. 

It’s true that the findings of the Jan. 6 panel may not make much difference in the upcoming midterms. But that’s another thing different about Thursday’s hearing: It seemed intended to document a momentous event for history, as much as, or more than, to sway votes.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

Scott Peterson/Getty Images/The Christian Science Monitor
Destroyed homes and cars mark where a Russian armored column was destroyed by Ukrainian airstrikes, as Ukrainians cope with the destructive aftermath of the monthlong military presence in Bucha, Ukraine, April 20, 2022.

Russia’s atrocities take time, stamina, and personnel to process. Digitally savvy Ukrainians have been assiduous in their fight to bring Russians to justice for war crimes.

A deeper look

Corporate America faces pressure to engage on social issues from guns to gay rights. But taking stands carries risks in politics and the marketplace. 

Lauren Devine/Courtesy of Grace Capital City
Worshippers greet each other during the opening segment of a service at Grace Capital City in Washington, where most of the 300 or so members are in their 20s.

Young people are searching for faith communities that prioritize connection and self-discovery over conformity to tradition. In the process, they are transforming sacred spaces and redefining worship. 

Points of Progress

What's going right

We’re used to getting rid of what is no longer useful. But in our progress roundup, we found farmers who stopped clearing the land to improve their crops and a country subsidizing repairs to keep electronics out of the trash.

Commentary

© 2022 Lucasfilm Ltd. & ™
Moses Ingram plays the villainous Jedi-hunter Reva in the new series “Obi-Wan Kenobi” on Disney+. After the show debuted at the end of May, Ms. Ingram received racist messages from a faction of “Star Wars” fans.

Casting “Star Wars” stories for the screen can be fraught. Actors of color, in particular, often face scrutiny and backlash. But a speedy official response recently suggests an effort to help society move toward more tolerance.


The Monitor's View

AP
Symbols of unity or division? The Gyanvapi mosque, left, and Kashiviswanath temple on the banks of the river Ganges in Varanasi, India.

In the run-up to India’s 75th anniversary of independence in August, and at a time when its founding premise of secular democracy is increasingly frayed, a quiet act of restraint offers a powerful lesson in how the norms and values of a society rest on the decisions of individual citizens.

Early on the morning of April 27, Muslims in the northeastern town of Ayodhya arose to find three mosques and a shrine desecrated by torn pages of sacred Islamic text, raw meat, and threats scribbled on hand-written notes. Triggering insults like those are not uncommon in India, and in Ayodhya they were potentially combustible. Thirty years ago Hindus razed a 16th-century mosque built there on a site they claimed was the birthplace of their deity Rama. The ensuing riots killed more than 2,000 people.

Yet this time Muslims calmly entrusted the matter to the police. That earned the support of an influential Hindu priest and the local member of Parliament from the ruling Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. “I strongly condemn this act,” said Lallu Singh, the MP. “No such activity should be carried out as it can disturb communal harmony.” Seven suspects were arrested, and district leaders started a dialogue with Muslim clerics.

It did not take long to illustrate why the unity forged in Ayodhya matters. A week later, fresh tensions erupted over another historic mosque in Varanasi, Hinduism’s holiest city set on the Ganges River. Hindus say the 17th-century Gyanvapi mosque was built on the site of a demolished temple and demand the right to pray there. Muslim worship has since been limited on the site while a district court investigates the claims. Meanwhile the city remains on edge.

Across India, the targeting of mosques and destruction of Muslim neighborhoods coincide with policies of the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi that are redefining the nation and its concept of citizenship on the basis of religion. Hindus make up roughly 80% of the population. Since 2014 the BJP has championed the Hindu nationalist view – forged in part in the Ayodhya mosque riots three decades ago – that Muslims are second-class citizens who rightfully should live in Pakistan. India’s northern neighbor was established as an Islamic republic when the subcontinent was partitioned at independence from British rule in 1947.

In recent years the rights of Muslims have been increasingly eroded. Since 2015, the year after Mr. Modi was first elected, a handful of states have outlawed beef – a staple of the Muslim diet in a country where cows are held as sacred by the Hindu majority. The laws impose lengthy jail sentences for slaughtering the animals. In 2018, states began enacting laws effectively banning interfaith marriage. And in 2019, the government passed the Citizen Amendment Act, which specifically excluded Muslims from special rights granted to immigrants of other religious backgrounds.

The cumulative effect of these laws, writes Niraja Gopal Jayal, a professor at King’s College London, in a newly published paper in the journal Studies in Indian Politics, “is an attempt to construe Indian citizenship as faith-based.”

In the increasingly fractured and openly tense atmosphere that this has created, Muslims and Hindus in Ayodhya showed that rejecting violence can have a unifying effect. When that is motivated by common spiritual principles, it can ennoble societies to renew their highest defining ideals.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

An expanded understanding of life as forever sustained by God comforts, heals, and uplifts.


A message of love

Ariel Schalit/AP
A scuba-diving volunteer collects trash during a World Oceans Day event in what was the ancient seaport of Caesarea on Israel's Mediterranean coast, June 10, 2022. Twenty-six volunteers removed around 100 pounds of garbage from between the sunken pillars and submerged ruins of the historic site as part of a United Nations World Oceans Day initiative.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thanks for ending the week with us. Come back Monday, when we’ll have a story about the thin line the U.S. walks when sharing intelligence information with Ukraine. 

More issues

2022
June
10
Friday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.