2022
April
06
Wednesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

April 06, 2022
Loading the player...

The sounds of opening day return Thursday. The smack of maple on cowhide. The cries of “Popcorn here-ah!” The eighth inning Fenway chorus of “Sweet Caroline.” These are some of the rites of a North American spring.

But when does cherished tradition become ossification, sapping vitality? 

Major League Baseball faces declining ticket sales and longer games with less action. Last year, the average game lasted a record 3 hours, 11 minutes – an eternity in the Twitter age. Most folks under the age of 50 would not describe the game as America’s “national pastime.” Or to put it another way, among sports accounts on Instagram, the highest ranking baseball player, Mike Trout, comes in at No. 130.

Fortunately, MLB is displaying a willingness to tinker with the centuries-old sport – and not a moment too soon: 

• In one experiment last season, minor league pitchers were limited to 15 seconds between pitches. As a result, the average game was shortened by 20 minutes

• In another minor league test last year, the pitching mound was moved back 1 foot to give the batter more time to hit the ball. 

• This year, to generate more action on the base paths, some MLB minor leagues will increase the size of second and third base (by 3 inches) and shorten the distance between the bases. An initial test last year showed this change produced more stolen bases. 

Some experiments, such as “robot umpires,” are delivering more integrity. Others are a bust. But the point is the league is seeking creative solutions. As the famed New York Yankees manager Yogi Berra once said, “The future ain’t what it used to be.”

For baseball, that’s likely to be a good thing.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

What’s life like under Russian military occupation? Our reporter reached out to residents of one southeastern Ukrainian city who spoke with open anger and defiance. 

Seth Wenig/AP
The results of a vote on a resolution condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine are displayed during an emergency meeting of the U.N. General Assembly on March 2, 2022. Half of the 35 countries that abstained – refusing to condemn Moscow – were from Africa, and another seven African representatives did not show up for the vote.

Nation-to-nation relationships are often complex. Our reporter looks at the varied motivations – ranging from historic loyalty to weapons deals – behind African support for Russia against Ukraine.

Monitor Breakfast

How is the U.S. economy doing? How about sanctions on Russia? We get the perspective of the director of the White House National Economic Council, who shared his views at the Monitor Breakfast Wednesday.

India is one of the few countries that doesn’t recognize marital rape as a crime. Our reporter looks at how women are doggedly pursuing justice on this issue. 

Essay

Cagla Gurdogan/Reuters
A boy leaves a toy in front of the Ukrainian Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, in honor of children killed during Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine, March 19, 2022. The conflict hits particularly close to home for our essayist, who has two adopted sons, one from Ukraine and the other from Russia.

A moving, personal essay that confirms there’s no natural enmity between people at war. And this father’s sons are proof of it.


The Monitor's View

Reuters
People in Israel hold a balloon during a demonstration by startup High Hopes Labs that is developing a balloon that captures carbon directly from the atmosphere at a high altitude.

The latest United Nations climate report, released Monday at some 3,000 pages, came with at least one surprise. It agreed with a few big oil exporters, such as Saudi Arabia, that the goal of halting global heating will require the capture of carbon pollutants and either burying or reusing them. Carbon removal for certain “hard-to-abate” uses of fossil fuels is “unavoidable” and “essential” to achieve net-zero emissions, the report stated.

This shift by the U.N. panel reflects more than recent advances in carbon removal technologies or a rapid increase of investments in them over the past five years. It also represents a more mature listening by policymakers to weigh the arguments of those offering alternative pathways to curb climate change.

Environmental groups have long been divided over whether to work with those seen as destroying nature. Treat them as enemies or potential collaborators? Are your opponents open to new ideas and compromise, or are they set to win?

Since its founding in 1988, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has steadily perfected the art of negotiating its policy recommendations, based on both scientific advice and inclusive deliberation. That has required less shaming and demonizing while learning to listen with respect and even empathy to others. One of the IPCC’s most contentious issues is whether endorsing technologies that might quickly fix global warming would lessen the drive to end the use of fossil fuels.

The report takes a cautious approach to that argument, emphasizing that carbon capture is not yet commercially viable or at a scale to greatly reduce  atmosphere warming. Nations must still cut oil and gas use by 60% to 70% by 2050. Yet it also accepts arguments that certain products made only from petroleum, such as plastics, might be needed in the far future, or that many underdeveloped countries may be slow to end their reliance on oil.

The report reflects a shift toward “carbon management” rather than decarbonizing the world economy. Much of Europe and North America, as well as Saudi Arabia, are already investing in carbon removal technologies. While these methods are still not yet as feasible a solution to global warming as renewable sources of energy, the U.N. panel’s serious consideration of them shows a better convergence of thinking on how to deal with climate change. Both urgency and understanding are needed to meet difficult climate goals. 


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

Recognizing our spiritual nature as restfully coexistent with God at all times enables us to overcome limitations associated with “insufficient” sleep.


A message of love

Courtesy of Melanie Stetson Freeman
It all started with this tree. I stumbled upon it while visiting Big Sur, California, with my husband. On vacations, I take photos for both of us, but I don’t bring my professional gear. All the images in this gallery were taken with my phone. But the real fun began when I converted this shot to black and white and upped the contrast. I got so excited with the results that I turned every image from then on into shades of gray. The subtle tones, the deep blacks contrasting with the light, make textures stand out. These compositions sing without color. Click "view gallery" to see the full series. – Melanie Stetson Freeman, staff photographer
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte and Karen Norris. )

A look ahead

Thanks for joining us. Come back tomorrow: We’re working on a story about the return of near-extinct Navajo-Churro sheep, which signals a cultural and economic revival too.

More issues

2022
April
06
Wednesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.