2020
October
23
Friday

Monitor Daily Podcast

October 23, 2020
Loading the player...
Peter Grier
Washington editor

Thursday’s final presidential debate probably won’t change many votes. President Donald Trump did not hurt himself, though his bar of expectations was low following a rough first debate in which he interrupted constantly. Challenger Joe Biden didn’t slip up, laid out prospective policies, and generally parried the president’s attacks.

In any case there aren’t many votes available to sway. Only about 5% of voters are undecided. With mail-in and early voting about one-third of estimated 2020 ballots – some 47 million – have already been cast.

But debates are still a useful exercise for American democracy.

For one thing debates juice turnout. Over 21 million people watched the debate live, and millions more saw clips and read media coverage. Debates are a clear, head-to-head competition. They can make partisans more excited to head to the polls for their side.

They’re also educational. On Thursday both challenger and incumbent told us who they would plan to be in the Oval Office. Mr. Biden talked like a conventional liberal Democratic nominee, who will try to solve major social problems with preestablished plans. President Trump was the President Trump of the last four years – a mix of bravado, false statements, and improvisation. 

And in the end debates are democracy itself. They are rituals that bring together millions of people, who watch and talk about them and judge candidates and think about who the nation’s leaders should be.

“Being engaged in politics, making observations, sharing experiences with others, these are what democracy is about,” tweeted Jennifer Victor, a George Mason University political science professor, following Thursday’s event.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

Working class voters from Rust Belt states were key to the 2016 election – and may yet decide 2020. Four years later, their concerns are the same: jobs and a future for their kids. But who do they feel best represents their values?

SOURCE:

New York Times polling data

|
Jacob Turcotte and Story Hinckley/Staff
Abdul Khaliq/AP
Afghan families leave their homes after fighting between the Afghan military and Taliban insurgents in Helmand Province, southwestern Afghanistan, Oct. 13, 2020.

The Taliban practice of “fighting while talking” has long raised questions about their commitment to peace in Afghanistan. Now, as more die and thousands flee, the U.S. is calling the tactic “very risky.”

Jacob Turcotte/Staff
Mark Humphrey/AP/File
Jane Grimes Meneely (center), a poll watcher on Election Day in 2016 at the Martha O'Bryan Center in Nashville, Tennessee, says of the smooth operation that day: “There was a part of me that wanted to use the training ... but also thankful that I didn’t have to.”

As the president urges his supporters to go en masse to watch polling, Americans of all political stripes are grappling with trust in the election process. Understanding the protections in place, like the tradition of poll watching, can help restore confidence. 

Juan Karita/AP
Luis Arce (center), Bolivian presidential candidate for the Movement Towards Socialism Party, and running mate David Choquehuanca (second right) celebrate during a press conference where they claim victory after general elections in La Paz, Bolivia, Oct. 19, 2020.

Right- and left-wing parties have closely watched Bolivia this year, ever since a disputed election sent longtime President Evo Morales into exile. But does socialists’ win at the polls this week foretell a resurgence of the “pink tide”?

Human Origins Program/Smithsonian/File
Scientists at the University of Minnesota's Olorgesailie Drill Core Workshop work to reconstruct key features of the ancient landscape and climate across time in the East African Rift Valley, in November 2015.

News of climate change sparks concern, but it also brings out humanity’s most prominent trait: the ability to innovate. One recent study suggests that this was as true in our distant past as it is today.


The Monitor's View

AP
Japanese soldiers arrive in South Sudan in 2016 as peacekeepers.

Twenty years ago this month the U.N. Security Council urged countries to involve more women in preventing conflict and building peace. Resolution 1325 was hailed as a landmark. It was based on a growing recognition that women and children are disproportionately affected by armed conflict and that women in roles from foot soldier to negotiator are critical in preventing it.

Progress toward that goal has been slow. Yet the idea has taken hold as shown in debates this month at the United Nations among diplomats and interest groups. In an open letter, 558 civil society organizations from 102 countries wrote that the architects of Resolution 1325 created history by focusing on “equal participation” of women in all aspects of security.

That need for equal participation is shown in the scope of modern conflicts. Every year since 1990, between 40 and 68 countries, home to 46% to 79% of the world’s population, have been involved in armed conflict, according to estimates published in The Lancet. At the start of the 20th century, 90% of people killed in conflict were combatants. By the start of the 21st century, that number had flipped: 90% of war casualties were civilians.

One sign of progress comes from the American military. Ambassador Jean Manes and Adm. Craig Faller, the civilian and military heads of U.S. Southern Command, note that peace negotiations are significantly more likely to succeed when women are involved. “Hard-won experience tells us that women are key to preventing conflict before it breaks out, and that their participation enables communities to curb escalating violence and defuse tensions between groups,” they write in Americas Quarterly.

Since 2000, the U.N. Security Council has approved nine more measures promoting the integration of women in peace strategies. Despite that, countries have not responded with much financial or political support. One example is the slow rise in the number of women in uniform. In 1993, women made up 1% of deployed troops. This year, they account for about 4.8% of military contingents and 10.9% of police units in U.N. peacekeeping missions. That is well below the pace needed to meet U.N. targets of women contributing 15% of deployed personnel, 30% of police units, and 25% of military observers and staff officers.

Outside the West, Latin America has seen perhaps the most significant advances for women in military and strategic roles. In the past decade, Chile, Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil, El Salvador, and Guatemala have adopted plans to integrate women into their armed forces. Brazil, Colombia, and El Salvador now have women flying combat aircraft. Female soldiers from Latin America are serving in peacekeeping missions in Sudan and Central African Republic.

In many countries, however, the role of women in combat remains contested. Skeptics point to a 2015 U.S. Marine Corps study that found all-male units outperformed gender-integrated units in physical and skills-based drills. Yet there is broad consensus that women bring a perspective to military planning and peacekeeping operations that engender trust and defuse conflict. They help open greater access to civilian populations in conflict zones, enabling better intelligence gathering. Their presence in uniform has been shown to decrease the use of excessive force and reduce the risk of sexual exploitation.

As the U.N. again looks at women’s role in preventing and ending conflict, the evidence keeps piling up that gender equality is a tool for peace, especially in reducing the killing of innocent civilians in war.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

Disheartened by a doctor’s advice that she learn to live with the pain of sciatica, a woman turned wholeheartedly to Christian Science for healing. The result was complete freedom from the pain she’d experienced for years, and the problem never returned.


A message of love

Daniel Munoz/Reuters/File
“When you walk along it, you can see your own reflection among the names” of fallen soldiers, Jan Scruggs, founder of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund and a veteran himself, said in 1982 of the newly built memorial. “And this actually has a psychological effect on people as they think about what life is all about.” Reflections have the power to reveal – whether it’s the image of someone the beholder aspires to be, or the beauty of something old. Even in the most warped refractions of real life, there is something to be understood – a new perspective, maybe. In her poem “Mirror,” Sylvia Plath imagined the purpose of her own looking glass: “I am not cruel, only truthful.” – Jules Struck, Staff writer
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Karen Norris. )

A look ahead

That’s a wrap for the news. Come back Monday. Our Washington bureau chief Linda Feldmann has been traveling with the president and we’ll have a letter from Air Force One. 

More issues

2020
October
23
Friday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.