2020
August
03
Monday

Monitor Daily Podcast

August 03, 2020
Loading the player...
April Austin
Weekly Deputy Editor, Books Editor

In January, when a group of editors and writers first gathered to talk about how we should cover the 100th anniversary of voting rights for women in the United States, we never dreamed that the project would be overshadowed by a pandemic and by protests over racial injustice. 

We wanted to tell the story not just of the 19th Amendment’s ratification on Aug. 18, 1920, and the ongoing struggle for equality today, but also of the evolution of women into global leaders.

One of the questions the group asked was: “Why has progress for American women not kept pace with that in many other developed nations?” After 100 years, shouldn’t women be on equal footing with men in every sphere, from boardrooms to living rooms to factory floors? We wanted to know what societal attitudes and perceptions impede this goal. We also wanted to explore leadership not just in the United States, but around the world.   

We decided to devote the entire Daily package, and the Aug. 3 issue of the Weekly, to examining women’s progress (and lack thereof). 

As we are learning, especially in recent months, a society cannot move forward with just one group holding the reins of power. Ultimately, leadership must be shared across race, class, economic status, and gender. Attitudes are shifting, slowly. As a professor in one story tells her students, “It’s not about ‘Just get out of [women’s] way.’ It’s walk the journey with them.”


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

A deeper look

Tennessee State Library and Archives
Women march for the right to vote in Nashville. Tennessee was the final state to ratify the 19th Amendment, passing it narrowly on Aug. 18, 1920.

The decadeslong fight for women’s suffrage is one of the defining civil rights struggles in U.S. history. It cuts to the heart of what democracy means – and holds powerful lessons for today. Part of our special 100th anniversary edition on women winning the right to vote.

Philip Davali/Ritzau Scanpix/Reuters
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen speaks in a Parliament room at Christiansborg Palace in Copenhagen, Denmark, May 6, 2020. When she took office in June 2019, she became her country's youngest prime minister.

A blend of decisiveness as well as empathy may be key to successful leadership – but so too is a political culture that values diverse voices. Part of our special 100th anniversary edition on women winning the right to vote.

Jamie Panico
Daniela Charris gives a speech about police brutality and anti-racism legislation to protesters in front of the Long Island City Courthouse in Queens, New York, on June 6, 2020. She says she can't imagine a day when she'll stop organizing.

Black and Latina women have often been sidelined in social movements. But today, a new generation of activists is seizing the moment to push for change, leading the way in protests against racism and police violence. 

Watch

One family, three generations, and 100 years of suffrage

Is voting a privilege, a right, or a duty? A century into women’s suffrage, the Monitor asks three generations of women in one family what voting means to them.

A family affair: Three generations of women discuss voting rights

Points of Progress

What's going right
Staff
Places where the world saw progress, for the Aug. 3, 2020 Monitor Weekly.

This is more than feel-good news – it's where the world is making concrete progress. A roundup of positive stories to inspire you.


The Monitor's View

AP
The League of Women Voters encourages voting in Pasadena, Calif., Feb. 14.

This August, American women entered a second century in which their right to vote has been ensured by the Constitution. Not all will take note of the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment. Compared with attitudes of the early 20th century, a woman’s right to vote seems as natural today as her ability to reason and to lead. That alone is worth celebrating. Much of humanity now expects steady progress in people claiming their inherent rights.

At times, such progress has been unnecessarily slow. While some women in the United States could vote as early as 1776, it took the force of conviction by the women’s suffrage movement and men gaining a wider understanding of unalienable rights to bring more political equality nationwide. The U.S. was behind some countries, such as New Zealand. Yet it was far ahead of many others. Women in Saudi Arabia won the right to vote only in 2015.

In 1872, when American activist Susan B. Anthony cast a vote in the presidential election and was convicted of a crime, she reminded a judge that a government derives its power from the consent of the governed. The right to vote, she stated, is as sacred as “rights to life, liberty, and property.” Government’s role is to secure such rights, not take or give them. She might have added that civic equality is also a route to happiness. Finland, with its history of gender balance, is often ranked as the world’s happiest country, a result in no small part from women bringing their full talents to shaping society. A focus on what women have to offer has often led to the fastest progress.

Like many activists, Anthony was acting on what she understood as universal. Unalienable rights are neither created nor lost. “The right [to vote] is ours. Have it, we must. Use it, we will,” she stated at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848.

The world’s achievements in claiming rights have relied on an acceptance of spiritual equality across gender, class, and race. The concept of “equal liberty” was a key message of Paul in the first century, based on Christ’s teachings. By the year 316, Roman emperor Constantine I declared that criminals could not be branded on the face because all people are “made in God’s image.” Many early Christians, as scholar Larry Siedentop writes in the book “Inventing the Individual,” understood “that only when women are free can men also be truly free – that the reciprocity which belief in human equality entails is only possible when their shared nature is fully acknowledged.”

The 19th Amendment helped shatter the excuses used to subordinate women. It was a prime moment of the world proclaiming the inherent equality of all.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

“In natural law and in religion the right of woman to fill the highest measure of enlightened understanding and the highest places in government, is inalienable ...” wrote the Monitor’s founder. And there’s a spiritual basis for that claim that empowers each of us to fulfill our potential with strength and grace.


A message of love

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff
When I became a photojournalist more than 30 years ago, most pictures in newspapers featured men in suits. Women, sadly, were largely absent – or relegated to the style pages. We’ve made progress since then. Throughout my career, I’ve worked to highlight the achievements of extraordinary women. I’m proud to share just a few of those stories here. None of the women are famous. I followed some for years, and met others for just hours. But each expressed remarkable intelligence, grace, and strength. They are my heroes. – Melanie Stetson Freeman

A look ahead

Thanks for joining us. Come back tomorrow for the Season 2 launch of our “Perception Gaps” podcast.

As a bonus read, we’re including Melissa Mohr’s “In a Word” column “A vote for the word ‘suffragist,’ not ‘suffragette.” The suffix -ette is still used to diminish and demean women, and those who campaigned for the vote preferred the gender-neutral “suffragist.”  

More issues

2020
August
03
Monday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.