2020
June
16
Tuesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

June 16, 2020
Loading the player...

As the National Basketball Association solidified plans to resume play in Orlando, Florida, next month, the league figured that pandemic safety concerns would keep some players at home. Now something else may stop their participation: their moral compass. 

NBA players are facing a dilemma: What’s the most effective way to help end racial injustice, to play or boycott?

Last Friday, injured Brooklyn Nets star Kyrie Irving hosted a Zoom meeting with more than 80 players. He urged them to cancel the NBA 2020 season, saying, “I’m willing to give up everything I have [for social justice],” reported The Athletic. 

Los Angeles Lakers center Dwight Howard released a statement Saturday that reads in part, “Basketball, or entertainment period, isn’t needed at this moment, and will only be a distraction.” 

The quest for racial equality is bigger than sports. And these NBA players want to seize what’s seen as historic momentum. Others, including LeBron James, argue that a televised NBA game offers a bigger advocacy platform – and a more diverse audience – than a Twitter following. 

We can do both. We can play and we can help change the way Black lives are lived,” Houston Rockets guard Austin Rivers wrote on Instagram. 

As some fans observe, to work – or not – is a multimillionaire’s dilemma. But the fact that these wealthy athletes are having a public debate over how to best push for lasting justice is a kind of progress too.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

Bryan R Smith/Reuters
People gather at the historic Stonewall Inn in New York for a rally June 15, 2020, after the Supreme Court upheld LGBTQ workplace rights.

Some may be surprised by the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling that protects sexual orientation and gender identity. Our reporter looks at why this decision makes sense to conservative justices.

SOURCE:

SCOTUSPoll

|
Jacob Turcotte/Staff
Goran Tomasevic/Reuters
A poster is seen at an entrance of Seattle Police Department East Precinct in the self-proclaimed Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, now renamed the Capitol Hill Occupy Protest, during a demonstration against racial inequality and in favor of defunding Seattle police, June 13, 2020.

Six blocks of Seattle – a so-called “autonomous zone” – jumped into the media spotlight last week, becoming a symbol of anarchy to some and reform to others. On the ground, our reporter found a more complicated picture.

Patterns

Tracing global connections

President Trump has long wanted closer relations with Moscow. Now he has a new motivation, writes our columnist, and it has bipartisan support: a desire to constrain China.

The Explainer

Matt York/AP
Protesters rally June 3, 2020, in Phoenix demanding the Phoenix City Council defund the Phoenix Police Department. The protest is a result of the death of George Floyd, a black man who died after being restrained by Minneapolis police officers on May 25.

On its face, “defund the police” sounds sweeping and radical. But the phrase, and the movement behind it, involves a lot of careful thought about how to improve safety through community policing.

Books

To understand this moment in America’s fraught history of race, we asked essayist Andrea King Collier for her recommendations. These books speak to the ways that Black people have been denied their humanity, and offer pathways toward equity, justice, and empathy.    


The Monitor's View

Reuters
People move boxes of fruit in the so-called "No Cop Co-Op" which is providing free items like food, drink, and hygiene products near the Seattle Police Department's East Precinct.

Protesters in Seattle have turned the city’s Capitol Hill neighborhood into a “cop-free zone,” forcing police officers to vacate their East Precinct building. After the recent killing of two black men by police in the United States, this is a novel attempt to redefine security for a community. Eventually the city will sort out a new role for its police, and protesters will end their “watch patrols.” But one aspect of the experiment should not end.

Citizens in the zone, dubbed Capitol Hill Occupy Protest, are realizing that safety also lies in providing for others. They have set up shelters and a community garden. They are picking up trash. Most of all they are donating food, water, and health supplies, especially face masks.

“You have people of all races coming in and helping,” one health care worker told the Monitor. “They just want to give something, anything to the cause. It’s a beautiful thing.”

This burst of neighborly generosity in the name of social justice fits a new nationwide poll. A survey by the group Cause and Social Influence found 20% of 18- to 30-year-olds have made a donation to address racial inequality, discrimination, or social injustice. The poll was taken soon after the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. That level of giving is nearly double found in other surveys in recent years. The giving was also the same across racial groups.

Young people are shaking up old patterns of giving in the U.S. They define giving broadly to include volunteering and peer-to-peer advocacy, says Laura MacDonald, vice chair of the Giving USA Foundation. They are less loyal to nonprofit institutions and more loyal to a cause.

The shift is not only among young people. Since the pandemic began, those wealthy Americans who have parked money in nonprofit financial institutions called donor-assisted funds have increased giving by 30% to 50%, according to Bloomberg News. The money is helping people such as health care providers and laid-off workers dependent on food banks.

Given the events of 2020, giving may never be quite the same. The U.S. in particular is coping with a pandemic, a recession, and now a mass movement for social justice. The good news is that charities entered the year after receiving in 2019 the second highest level of donations on record. Adjusted for inflation, the amount was $449.64 billion, according to Giving USA.

The giving environment is very dynamic right now, says Ms. MacDonald. Indeed in Seattle, the new dynamics of generosity are playing out in one neighborhood. In the end, giving is about providing a safe and secure life for each other.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

All too often, health, hope, and joy may seem vulnerable. But a sincere desire to feel God’s grace and to reflect it toward others opens the door to more healing and harmony in our lives.


A message of love

Fernando Llano/AP
A Mexican artisan wearing a face mask decorated with an image of iconic Mexican artist Frida Kahlo attends a protest in Mexico City, June 16, 2020. Artisan families from Oaxaca are asking for financial help, months after the city government closed their market as part of the lockdown to curb the spread of COVID-19.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte and . )

A look ahead

Come back tomorrow. We’re working on a story about how Washington’s response to the George Floyd protests may be undermining U.S. moral authority abroad.

If you're a member of the reddit social media community, our Supreme Court reporter Henry Gass will be doing an Ask Me Anything (AMA) event about the limits of U.S. presidential power under the law at 1 p.m. E.T. Wednesday, at the politics subreddit community.

More issues

2020
June
16
Tuesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.