2018
June
04
Monday

Monitor Daily Podcast

June 04, 2018
Loading the player...
Mark Sappenfield
Senior global correspondent

Jin Park has a message for you: Your talents are not really your own. The graduating Harvard senior said as much during the university’s recent commencement ceremonies.

“Our particular positions within the web of society come to us most of all through fortune, not desert,” he said. Therefore, he added, “we must think about our talents as a collective asset.”

The comment captures the thought radiating from many college campuses today. Privilege is a fraught topic, economically and racially. One tendency can be to think of it in a zero-sum way – that advancement takes from one to give to another. By that reckoning, “collective” thinking sometimes sounds like just making everyone average.

But that’s not really what Mr. Park was saying. When we realize that so much of our success is built from good beyond our control – be it loving parents, a stable community, or dedicated teachers or mentors – we realize that that good is greater than us, and we have just had the fortune to share it. This turns that zero-sum equation on its head. Goodness, when shared, grows. Free market capitalism essentially operates on that principle.

By that reckoning, one of the most powerful questions anyone can ask, Park said, is not “What am I going to do with my talents?”; it is “What am I going to do for others with my talents?”

Here are our five stories for the day, which look at the political value of home, an improbable natural wonder, and the power of language.  


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

The careful calibration of Monday's US Supreme Court ruling in the Masterpiece Cake Shop case resulted in no sweeping decision. Instead, it "invited us all to turn down the heat in the culture wars," says one legal scholar.

President Trump has said that he has the right to pardon himself. The statement shines a light on how much has changed in politics since the last time a president made similar bold claims.

Jossy Ola/AP/FILE
A man walks past burned-out houses following an attack by Boko Haram in Dalori village near Maiduguri, Nigeria, in early 2016. Over the past decade, nearly 3 million people in the region have fled their homes, most of them northern Nigerians escaping guerrilla attacks by the Islamist insurgent group.

How much would you risk to go home? That's the question tens of thousands of Nigerians displaced by Boko Haram are grappling with as officials push for their return to a region many deem unsafe.

Valeria Pizarro
Locals call the Varadero reef in Cartagena, Colombia, 'the improbable reef.' It has persevered in the midst of intensive coastal development, streams of toxic runoff from a nearby canal, and waters so warm they’d turn many reefs into lifeless skeletons.

Beneath the murky waters of one of South America’s busiest ports, the Varadero coral reef has become an unlikely symbol of survival and beauty.

Saving the Varadero coral reef

Like other countries, the United States is trying to figure out how best to regulate the internet. The debate is showing how deeply language affects the way we see complex things.


The Monitor's View

Reuters
Leftist front-runner Andrés Manuel Lopéz Obrador of the National Regeneration Movement (MORENA) addresses a campaign rally in Patzcuaro, Michoacan state, Mexico May 31.

Mexicans are preparing to vote in elections that carry big implications for both their country and the United States. They will choose a new president and thousands of other officials on July 1.

With the two countries entwined as never before, the vote – as well as recent decisions by President Trump – calls for special care of a special relationship.

The front-runner in the presidential campaign is Andrés Manuel Lopéz Obrador, commonly known as AMLO, a former mayor of Mexico City. He is a well-known leftist who ran unsuccessfully for president twice before. He has so far focused his campaign on rooting out corruption and standing up for the less well-off.

Much of his popularity is also based on a widespread perception that the past two presidents and their political parties – the right of center National Action Party (PAN) and the long-dominant Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) – were not able to control unprecedented levels of criminal violence or generate sufficient economic growth to benefit most Mexicans.

AMLO proposes to replace the “mafia of power” with a government working for the “good people.” The 25,000 violent homicides in 2017, the highest number recorded in the past 20 years, have convinced many of the need for change. Polls show AMLO’s lead holds across all demographics, including the well educated.

Compared with his closest rival, AMLO has much less experience in dealing with the US. This leaves his potential management of US-Mexican relations unclear. He and aides have rebutted criticisms that he might follow the path of Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez. He has dispatched aides to Washington and New York in an effort to reassure influential Americans about his intentions.

This shows that the election will not only determine Mexico’s direction but will affect the US. What happens in and with Mexico touches more US lives daily than events in any other country because of a combination of trade, family ties, and other connections. An estimated 35 million US citizens are of Mexican heritage. More than a million legal crossings take place each day along the 1,990-mile border. Mexico is America’s second largest export market, and the US is by far Mexico’s largest trading partner.

At the same time, studies estimate that some 5.5 million Mexicans are in the US illegally, though the number may have dropped over the past 10 years. Illegal drugs and unauthorized immigrants (now mostly from Central America) still head north across the border, while arms and billions of dollars from drug sales head south to criminal groups.

Since 2007, US-Mexican security cooperation has deepened on fighting drug trafficking, illegal immigration, and terrorism, becoming critical to US security. In 2017, Mexican and US cabinet members agreed on a strategic plan for going after transnational organized crime involved in drug trafficking. In recent testimony to Congress, US officials described bilateral security cooperation as unprecedented. 

The massive improvement in the relationship stems from the growing commercial ties built since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was negotiated 25 years ago. Since then, US-Mexican trade has multiplied by six, with substantial investments flowing from both sides. Some 5 million US jobs depend on business with Mexico, compared with an estimated 700,000 in 1993.

Today, the two countries build things together. Mexico’s finished manufactured exports to the US, for example, contain the highest levels of US parts and supplies by far compared with those of any other trading partner. Many economists argue that the relationship has made both economies stronger and helped many US companies fend off competition from low-wage countries in Asia while keeping prices lower for US consumers.

On May 31, Mr. Trump applied tariffs to steel and aluminum from Mexico (as well as from Canada and the European Union), which many interpreted as a step to increase pressure on those countries to reach new trade agreements on US terms. Mexico announced a list of US products to which it will apply reciprocal retaliatory tariffs. These moves threaten not only the ongoing renegotiation of NAFTA but also the $600 billion in yearly trade and Mexico’s cooperation on security.

So far, the Mexican presidential campaign has largely focused on domestic issues rather than the country’s ties to the US. Nevertheless, the tariffs and frequent anti-Mexico tweets by Trump are perceived as unfair. Many Mexicans also view US demands in the NAFTA negotiations as unreasonable and threatening. Not surprisingly, critical opinions of the US among Mexicans are well over 50 percent compared with 29 percent three years ago. Mexico’s government will not want to be perceived as yielding to US pressure tactics.

No matter who wins the presidential election, it is not in the interest of the US to jeopardize an important relationship. For decades, the economic well-being and security of both countries have improved when they seek “win-win” solutions. During these critical next few weeks in Mexico, the US must find ways to mend its ties with a close neighbor.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

Today’s author shares how no circumstance can separate us from the love of God.


A message of love

Kin Cheung/AP
Students at the University of Hong Kong place flowers June 4 on the 'Pillar of Shame' statue, a memorial for those injured and killed in the crackdown on protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square 29 years ago. Tens of thousands of people were expected to attend an annual candlelight vigil for victims of the action by Chinese military.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thanks for joining us today. Please come back tomorrow when correspondent Taylor Luck looks at protests in Jordan that have brought down the prime minister. Young Jordanians are finding their voice for the very first time – without the divisive political language that doomed the Arab Spring.

More issues

2018
June
04
Monday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.