2017
August
09
Wednesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

August 09, 2017
Loading the player...
Amelia Newcomb
Senior editor

The war of words Tuesday between the United States and North Korea comes against a noteworthy historical backdrop. Seventy-two years ago Sunday, the US dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima. Seventy-two years ago today, it dropped a second one on Nagasaki.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe urged progress toward abolishing nuclear arms as he spoke at a commemoration in Hiroshima, where about 80,000 people were killed instantly in 1945 and everything within a mile’s radius of the explosion was obliterated.

Regardless of where you stand on Truman’s decision to deploy nuclear weapons, we can all agree on the need to avoid a repeat use. But the atmosphere is increasingly edgy as the world confronts North Korea’s intensifying nuclear threat. That means world leaders must choose their words carefully. Tuesday, President Trump vowed “fire and fury” if the North took military action; the North retorted soon after that Guam would be a good target. More jostling followed.

That prompted Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to say that “Americans should … have no concerns about this particular rhetoric of the last few days.” That follows his comments, directed toward the North, that the US does not seek regime change or a military confrontation north of the 38th parallel. Those were words issued with the full understanding of a critical reality: that verbal misunderstandings can quickly grow into something far more worrisome.  


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

James Lawler Duggan/Reuters
Democrats huddle before unveiling the party's 'A Better Deal' plan in Berryville, Va., on July 24. From left to right: US Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia.

Democrats and Republicans are grappling with the same issue: It's not enough to be against something. You have to be for something – and clearly communicate what that is.

We all know the internet can connect far-flung communities of interest. Most of the time, that's good. But it can also perpetuate discredited ideas.

Martial Trezzini/Keystone/AP
Carla del Ponte, the senior Swiss prosecutor and member of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, attended a press conference at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva in March. She says she is resigning from the commission after a five-year stint, accusing the Security Council of failing to hold war criminals accountable.

The resignation of Swiss prosecutor Carla del Ponte from a UN panel on Syrian war crimes underscores the deep challenges confronting those who battle for justice on the global stage. 

Points of Progress

What's going right

It doesn't get much attention. But Arab women are making headway in shifting perceptions of their social status – breaking through powerful constraints that silenced their voices and limited their rights. 

Pin the cannonball on King George? Forget seeing "Hamilton" on Broadway. It's a lot cheaper – and possibly almost as much fun – to drop in at one of the "Hamilton"-themed parties that are sweeping the tween set.


The Monitor's View

AP Photo
Tens of thousands of North Koreans carrying propaganda slogans gathered for an Aug. 9 rally at Kim Il Sung Square in Pyongyang as a show of support for their rejection of the United Nations' latest round of sanctions.

As North Korea’s capability for nuclear war has grown, so too has its war of words with the United States. The rhetorical warfare peaked this week with President Trump promising “fire and fury” if North Korea makes more threats. The North then said it was weighing a strike on Guam, a US territory in the western Pacific Ocean.

Amid the nuclear brinkmanship and the tit-for-tat diktats, it is important to remember where North Korea is at its weakest and most vulnerable. Its missiles may be traveling farther and its estimated 60 atomic bombs may be missile-ready, as US intelligence claims. Yet its military strength cannot cover up the fact that the regime of Kim Jong-un is living a lie, one that it will not admit and that could be its undoing.

For nearly seven decades, North Korea has claimed to its people that it is self-sufficient in its economy and self-reliant in defense. This ideology of “juche” was false from the start. When Kim Il-sung, the grandfather of the current leader and the nation’s founder, wanted to invade South Korea in 1950, he hardly did it on his own. He asked permission from the Soviet Union’s Joseph Stalin. And then he relied on military assistance from China’s Mao Zedong.

The point was made again in the mid-1990s when a great famine struck North Korea – a result of its false notion of self-sufficiency in agriculture. It was forced to accept emergency food aid.

The reliance on others continues to this day. Some 60,000 to 80,000 North Koreans have been sent abroad to earn hard currency. And despite the latest economic sanctions ordered Aug. 5 by the United Nations Security Council, the country still relies on China for oil and as an export market for North Korea's fishing fleet. The new sanctions will only cut its $3 billion annual export revenue by a third.

A government can survive for only so long in a contradiction between its ideals and its actions. And the truth about North Korea is that it has long needed trade, aid, and technology from other countries. Just as individuals who self-isolate come to realize their bond with humanity, North Korea must eventually admit the truth of its reliance on the international community – and along with it, the norms of peace and the necessity of constraints on nuclear weapons.

The Soviet Union came out of its myth of closed markets in 1985 under Mikhail Gorbachev’s policy of perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness). It then joined the global economic system (which led to the Soviet Union’s collapse). In 1986, Vietnam’s Communist Party followed Moscow with its doi moi (rejuvenation) and embrace of markets (and later, good relations with the US).

The biggest lesson for North Korea, however, may lie in its closest ally, China.

Like the Kim family, Mao believed in self-sufficiency for China from 1950 until his death in 1976. His successor, Deng Xiaoping, realized how Mao’s ideology had left China behind other countries and was the cause of mass starvation. In addition, tens of thousands of Chinese were fleeing to Hong Kong.

Deng’s trip to France in 1975 transformed his thinking. “The more we see, the more we realize how backward we are,” he said. By 1979, China’s Communist Party opened itself to reform and cooperating with other countries – although not enough to jeopardize the party’s power. By 1992, China even opened relations with South Korea for the sake of business.

Mao’s promise of self-sufficiency is now largely broken. And despite recent threats to its neighbors’ territories, China mostly operates within international norms. This transition, as well as China’s continuing aid to North Korea, is why Beijing is the focus of the US and others in tightening sanctions on North Korea.

The ultimate goal is to awaken the Kim regime to the same realization of many other countries: that a country cannot live a lie. North Korea must admit it is no island. It already relies on others and can rely even more on them if it only contains or eliminates its nuclear weapons.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

We tend to think of things in limited quantities – limited amounts of water, oil, gas, etc. We often even think of spiritual attributes in limited terms, such as limited patience, compassion, or cooperation. But God sends each of us boundless spiritual resources to meet our needs, large or small. “God gives you His spiritual ideas, and in turn, they give you daily supplies,” wrote Monitor founder Mary Baker Eddy (“Miscellaneous Writings 1883-1896, p. 307). Christian Scientist Blythe Evans experienced this one time when funds were scarce. She prayed to better understand that God, divine Love, was supplying all that her family needed. About that time, an unsought opportunity spontaneously arose to run a business from home using a skill she already had. As we come to trust in God’s boundless spiritual resources, we realize that we can never truly lack what we require day by day, and step by step our human needs are met.


A message of love

Rajanish Kakade/AP
Members of the Maratha Revolutionary Front staged a silent march in Mumbai Wednesday. Tens of thousands of people waving saffron flags marched silently through the city demanding quotas in government jobs and education for the underprivileged Maratha community in western India.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

That's it for today. Tomorrow, we'll travel to a remote corner of the Tibetan Plateau, where traditional horse racing offers a window on the relationship between Han Chinese and the Tibetan population. 

More issues

2017
August
09
Wednesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.