2017
May
10
Wednesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

May 10, 2017
Loading the player...

Motives are important in politics, as in life, and speculation about the rationale behind President Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey is reverberating around Washington – not to mention the country.

Lack of clarity over why the president moved so abruptly has fueled unease and driven a storm of questions: Why, and why now? Can Mr. Comey’s replacement be trusted? Is this a political turning point in an administration beset by tumult? For that matter, how should we interpret why press secretary Sean Spicer hid behind a large hedge last night before finally facing a press desperate for insight?

It's obvious Mr. Trump has wanted to fire Comey. But how he explains the dismissal, and whom he nominates to replace Comey, will shape an array of issues going forward – from investigating Russia’s influence in the 2016 vote to Trump’s agenda with Congress.

Motives speak to foundational values. When they’re understood, even those who disagree with an action can feel reassured. When they’re not, doubt and dissent fester, undermining faith in all actions, innocent or not.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
James Comey testified before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on agency oversight on Capitol Hill May 3. He was abruptly fired from the FBI director’s post last night.

First up: Staff writer Henry Gass, along with Washington bureau chief Linda Feldmann, explains why Task No. 1 for the White House may now be to reassure Americans that the FBI will be able to function independently as the nation's top law enforcement agency.

From the Russian point of view, the Comey firing will have no impact on US-Russian relations. But as questions over the motives for the move sow doubts, negotiations that once might have seemed normal – especially those that take place behind closed doors – could now be seen in a different light.

Hong Hae-in/Yonhap/AP
South Korea's new President Moon Jae-in waves from a car after his inauguration ceremony in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, May 10, 2017. Moon said Wednesday he was open to visiting rival North Korea under the right conditions to talk about Pyongyang's aggressive pursuit of nuclear-tipped missiles.

South Koreans are asking the same question that’s cropping up in many countries: Can we trust our government? Anger over corruption drove millions of protesters into the streets last fall – and carried newly elected President Moon Jae-in into office. Now, many young people in particular are eager – and willing – to do the hard work of keeping up the pressure for transparency and honest government. 

Jacob Turcotte/Staff

Special Report

Fortitude under pressure is always admirable. But a steady hand amid intense personal loss – combined with a drive to help others avoid a similar experience – is awe-inspiring. One parent shows us what that looks like. 

What’s in a word? For kids, a good vocabulary can affect everything from a strong start in school to an inclination to pick a fight. But starting from birth, many children, especially those from low-income and immigrant families, don’t get spoken to enough – or they have too much time in front of the TV. So government officials and private groups alike are speaking up – helping parents who are often overloaded or don’t speak English well to understand how they can start a very important conversation. This short video by Alfredo Sosa, our photography and multimedia director, had editors talking about an inspiring program in a city just to our south.

How to end the word gap? Cities invest big in baby talk.

The Monitor's View

AP Photo
Solicitor General nominee Noel Francisco, left, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division nominee Makan Delrahim, center, and Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, nominee Steven Engel, are sworn-in before testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing on their nominations, on Capitol Hill in Washington, May 10.

 With President Trump’s controversial firing of FBI Director James Comey, the next crucial step in Washington is to restore the faith of Americans in rule of law. Mr. Trump must quickly nominate a new FBI chief who can pass Senate scrutiny and has enough independence to keep alive the agency’s probes of alleged wrongdoing – from Russian meddling to security leaks – that led to this crisis.

Americans have shown a keen interest in the process of choosing high-level officials of justice with the recent selections of a new Supreme Court justice, a new attorney general, and others. While the Senate may debate a person’s character, policies, or past decisions, this collective desire helps bind the process: Pick someone who can fairly apply the universal principles embedded in law to both individuals and society.

Not all nations adhere to this belief in an impersonal good that, if not yet fully grasped by everyone, is at least applied by a chosen few who, in being selected in a democratic way, are seen as virtuous, practical, and wise people.

Over the centuries, most nations have moved beyond the idea that rule of law comes from a monarch who claims a divine mandate. But many countries still tolerate autocrats who impose their will rather than honor the people’s hope to anchor human justice in the all-embracing higher concepts of justice, such as equality before the law and the intrinsic worth of the individual.

That hope for eternal ideas and virtues that guide human life has a long history. For Americans, it is found in this famed sentence in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, and that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Much of the public passion over the Comey firing is driven by this persistent desire to maintain a society guided by principles aptly applied by those with the widest support. The Senate, in tandem with the president, remains the vehicle for such an important selection.

If Americans do not want their institutions of justice – from the FBI to the Supreme Court – to become even more political than they are now, they and their representatives must reinforce the time-tested hope for a common good in decisions of law. That motive above all should guide the process of approving a new FBI chief.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

Love meets every need. No matter the circumstance, or the depth of our grief, divine Love is reaching out to us, holding us, and meeting our need.


A message of love

Thomas Peter/Reuters
The 'Golden Bridge on Silk Road' installation, by the artist Shuyong, is drawing attention ahead of the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing. The Sunday-to-Monday event will promote President Xi Jinping’s trade and infrastructure initiatives. Invitations were sent to Russian and North Korean delegations. South Korean leaders were not on the guest list, owing to tensions over a US missile ­defense system in Seoul.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thank you for joining us today. We look forward to connecting with you again tomorrow. Among other things, we’ll take a look at how Venezuela’s problems became so dire – and where it goes from here to restore stability.

More issues

2017
May
10
Wednesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.