When reporters become part of the story

As wildfires ripped across California, Monitor journalists who live in Greater Los Angeles share their own experiences of a historic conflagration.

|
Chris Pizzello/AP
Firefighters extinguish burning embers at a house in Altadena, California, Jan. 9.

Many readers of the Monitor’s Weekly magazine know that our first package of news stories is most often categorized “Humanity Behind the Headlines.”

As news journalists, we follow a general convention of keeping our presence out of the stories we cover, focusing on those affected by a news event or important issue. We write in a tone and with a style that mostly removes our emotions and opinions from a story.

But this week, the humanity behind our headlines includes Monitor journalists who live in Greater Los Angeles. They are not just covering this historic conflagration; they are living it.

In the newsroom, as the scope and devastation of the fires was just starting to become clear in early January, there was concern, and even a hint of panic, when we couldn’t immediately reach a Monitor writer. When the person finally checked in, relief.

For the magazine team, the quickly moving Los Angeles fires were a kind of “stop the presses” moment. We had this issue of the Weekly planned and mostly laid out, and it featured an international cover story about the decline of the German automaker Volkswagen by special correspondent Lenora Chu.

But as we pivoted to rearrange this issue as quickly as we could, it soon became clear that, for us, this was not just a rapid response to a disaster affecting a lot of people. It was affecting a part of our family.

I’ve known my colleagues Francine Kiefer and Ali Martin for years, and they both have decades of experience.

Francine covered the fall of the Berlin Wall and spent years in Washington covering the White House and then Congress. Ali covered the NATO peacekeeping mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the impact of the crash of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania during 9/11. This winter, again, they are intrepid professionals covering a crisis.

Both of them sprang into action as the fires began to rage. But at the same time, the crisis was theirs, their homes and families potentially at risk. It was a personal story for them, and together, we decided they should write from a first-person point of view, and report their own worries and laments and vulnerabilities as they relayed the news.

Or, in other words, their own humanity behind the headlines. We are all grateful that neither lost her home or a loved one during a time of trauma for so many.

As I edited Francine's and Ali's stories, I felt I got to know them in such a deeper way. My hope is that Monitor readers will as well.

This column first appeared in the Feb. 3 issue of The Christian Science Monitor Weekly. Subscribe today to receive future issues of the Monitor Weekly magazine delivered to your home.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to When reporters become part of the story
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/From-the-Editors/2025/0202/LA-fires-Ali-Martin-Francine-Kiefer
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe