Why Starbucks is pulling back from 'Race Together' campaign

Following a backlash of criticism, CEO Howard Schultz announced Sunday that baristas will stop writing 'Race Together' on customers’ coffee cups.

|
Ted S. Warren/AP Photo/File
In this March 18, 2015 file photo, Larenda Myres holds an iced coffee drink with a "Race Together" sticker on it at a Starbucks store in Seattle. Starbucks baristas will no longer write "Race Together" on customers' cups starting Sunday, ending as planned a visible component of the company's diversity and racial inequality campaign that had sparked widespread criticism in the week since it took effect.

Starbucks’ “Race Together” campaign continues – just not on your coffee cups.

Less than a week after the coffee giant kicked off the social awareness program aimed at encouraging dialogue on race relations, CEO Howard Schultz announced Sunday that baristas will no longer be writing “Race Together” on coffee cups, ending a key but widely criticized component of the campaign.

“While there has been criticism of the initiative – and I know this hasn't been easy for any of you – let me assure you that we didn’t expect universal praise,” Mr. Schultz wrote in a company memo.

The initiative, which launched last Monday, did gain support from those who saw it as an attempt to introduce conversation about an important social issue.

But it also met with derision from online critics, some of whom noted that, unlike with its lower-level employees, Starbucks’ executive team suffers from an apparent lack of diversity. (While about 40 percent of baristas belong to racial minorities, less than a sixth of Starbucks executives are people of color, according to The Economist.)

Some accused the company of trying to profit from a hot-button topic, while others said being ambushed with a discussion on race while getting their morning coffee was not something they had willingly signed up for.

Shortly after the launch, Corey duBrowa, the company’s vice president for communications, deleted his Twitter account, saying he felt “personally attacked in a cascade of negativity.” He has since returned to social media.

Some pundits have argued that the public’s violent reaction against Starbucks’ efforts could cause other companies to back away from tackling social issues, particularly race.

“If we don't tamp down the backlash against [the] Starbucks 'Race Together' campaign, I fear that no major corporation will even try to talk about race again – for maybe 10 or 20 years,” CNN commentator Van Jones wrote.

He went on:

In the past 48 hours, racial justice activists have spilled more digital ink criticizing Starbucks for trying to fight racism than they have against other (actually racist) companies. The truth is that we cannot have it both ways. We cannot demand that companies address race, and then attack them when they try.

Starbucks doesn’t appear too fazed by the criticism, however, possibly because “Race Together” is not the first time the company has engaged in social and political discourse: Over the years, Starbucks has initiated campaigns promoting job growth, partisan cooperation, and gun control.

Spokeswoman Laurel Harper denied that the company was reacting to criticism, and said that it was prepared for the backlash, according to The New York Times.

"When we initially began the 'Race Together' initiative, what we wanted to do is spark the conversation, because we believe that is the first step in a complicated issue," Ms. Harper told the Times. "Leading change isn't an easy thing to accomplish."

And though it hadn't been announced to the public previously, Schultz noted in his memo that the part of the campaign involving baristas writing “Race Together” on cups was originally scheduled to end March 22, anyway.

The initiative, Schultz added, “is far from over." In the weeks and months to come, the company will be announcing, among others, open forums, three special sections on USA Today that focus on racial issues, more discussion with police and community leaders, and “new partnerships to foster dialogue and empathy and help bridge the racial and ethnic divides within our society.”

“This is who we are,” Harper told the Times. “Our mission is to inspire and nurture the human spirit, one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time. We know that we don’t have all the solutions and the answers, but for us, doing nothing makes us part of the problem.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Starbucks is pulling back from 'Race Together' campaign
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Bite/2015/0323/Why-Starbucks-is-pulling-back-from-Race-Together-campaign
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe