Former Reddit chief now aims to tackle sexism in Silicon Valley

Ellen Pao, who unsuccessfully sued Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers for gender discrimination, joins the Kapor Center for Social Impact.

|
Eric Risberg/AP Photo/File
Ellen Pao leaves the Civic Center Courthouse during a lunch break in her trial in San Francisco against a former employer for gender discrimination in February 2015.

Silicon Valley has been known for its lack of gender diversity but one woman aims to close the gap.

Ellen Pao, whose unsuccessful suit against a former employer for gender discrimination highlighted sexism in Silicon Valley, joined Kapor Center for Social Impact Wednesday to head its diversity and inclusion efforts, Reuters reports. 

In a three-year legal battle that highlighted what many see as a lack of diversity at many technology companies and tech investment firms, Ms. Pao sued her former employer, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, for gender discrimination and retaliation. The jury ruled in favor of the venture capital firm in 2015. 

In her new role at the Kapor Center, a nonprofit founded by Lotus spreadsheet software founder Mitch Kapor and his wife Freada Kapor Klein, Ms. Pao, who also served as former interim chief executive officer of Reddit, aims to help startups ensure they have a diverse workplace. 

"I see a lot of opportunity in diversity and inclusion," she told USA Today. "Bringing different genders and people of different races and ethnicities onto teams and onto boards has a huge impact on financial performance and improves your product."

She will also serve as a venture partner at Kapor Capital, an Oakland, Calif.-based firm that invests in startups that try to solve problems for underserved people.

Commending on Pao’s experience working in tech and inclusion, Ms. Klein said Pao is in the perfect position to help close the gaps.

"Ellen will be responsible for weaving together all of our efforts to accurately identify the obstacles to creating and sustaining a diverse and inclusive tech ecosystem, and provide a comprehensive practical solution," Klein told Forbes.

Pao's lawsuit also inspired the "Elephant in the Valley" survey, a survey of more than 200 women in the Bay Area-centered tech industry in which 60 percent of the women said they have been sexually harassed, and vast majority said they have witnessed sexism at off-site events, The Christian Science Monitor reported. 

This announcement comes at a time when many major tech companies are filing their annual diversity reports for the past year.

Although many major tech companies set goals around hiring, their diversity reports indicate that they might need to do more. At Apple in 2016, for example, just 32 percent of employees globally are women. At  Microsoft, that figure is 25.8 percent. At both companies, about twice the number of women held nontechnical roles compared to technical ones, and leadership positions are almost exclusively dominated by men. 

In an effort in July to explain the disparity, Facebook argued that the roots of problem lie farther upstream.

"It has become clear that at the most fundamental level, appropriate representation in technology or any other industry will depend upon more people having the opportunity to gain necessary skills through the public education system," Maxine Williams, global director of diversity said in a statement. 

But this "pipeline" argument has its critics come under fire from diversity thinkers, as NPR reported in July: 

"This is a multifaceted problem. ... But when you hear these inane kind of platitudes and then pushing the responsibility off to the pipeline, it's insulting," says Catherine Bracy, co-founder of the Oakland TechEquity Collaborative and former community organizer at Code for America. "The fact that you can't hire people into nontechnical roles, how do you account for that?"

Others have pointed to these companies’ hiring systems. Bloomberg reported Monday that, despite Facebook’s efforts to give priority to engineering candidates from underrepresented groups, the company still sees little change in its department’s demographics.

Joelle Emerson, a diversity consultant, identified Facebook’s hindering hiring process, in which an almost white or Asian male leadership makes final decisions – a practice common in Silicon Valley – as the key.

"Because it's far easier to think about bringing people into the funnel," she told Bloomberg. "It's harder to think about changing a broader process that a company has been using for maybe ten years."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Former Reddit chief now aims to tackle sexism in Silicon Valley
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2017/0112/Former-Reddit-chief-now-aims-to-tackle-sexism-in-Silicon-Valley
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe