RideAustin: Can a nonprofit do what Uber and Lyft could not?

After Uber and Lyft left town over a fingerprinting showdown, the vacuum may be filled by a nonprofit designed specifically for the 'Keep Austin Weird' city. 

|
Lucy Nicholson/Reuters
A driver displays Uber and Lyft ride sharing signs in his car windscreen in Santa Monica, Calif. A new nonprofit ride-hailing app is opening in Austin, Texas, in the wake of Uber and Lyft leaving the city.

Uber and Lyft are out. Nonprofits are in.

That may be the new reality for the transportation industry in Austin, Texas. Uber and Lyft, twin ride-hailing giants, quit the city after losing at the ballots over increased regulations for drivers, including fingerprinting. Their exodus has left a sizeable gap in the ride-hailing market, and a new nonprofit is trying to fill it.

On Monday, RideAustin launched its ride-hailing app at an event in the iconic Alamo Drafthouse. The service is taking a nonprofit, community-oriented approach to the industry, seeking to offer drivers better pay and help charities at the same time.

But as Austin becomes center stage for a multitude of small ride-hailing providers, can a nonprofit compete?

"People feel like [Uber and Lyft] lost an election they dumped $10 million into, and took their ball and went home, leaving everybody high and dry," Ride Austin community engagement director Joe Deshotel said in an interview with BuzzFeed News. "We're building something community-based. I think people are going to support that."

Uber and Lyft made their Austin exit on May 9, two days after a proposition to grant the company's additional leniency to self-regulate was rejected by city voters. Since then, the ride-hailing landscape has had slim pickings. GetMe, a smaller ride-hailing service, has been the only one with cars on the ground, according to Buzzfeed. But summer is coming, along with more providers.

Fasten, a service currently operating in Boston, is speeding up its launch date for Austin service. San Francisco-based Wingz, which has been focused on airport runs, has launched WingzAround in Austin, a new beta service that allows customers to pre-book rides to destinations throughout the city. Lastly, Warp Ridesharing, still in its planning stage, is gaining funding on Kickstarter as an additional local alternative for Austinites (although still far behind what it needs).

Despite the competition, some industry experts say RideAustin's nonprofit status will give the company an edge.

"It's easier to fund, because contributions are tax-deductible and investors aren't focused on a financial return, so the risks are different," Capital Factory CEO Joshua Baer wrote in a blog post about RideAustin. "As a nonprofit and community-focused solution it has extra press and goodwill needed to achieve critical mass quickly."

For a nonprofit, sustaining large profit-margins won't be the prime concern. And the profit should be reinvested into the operation, rather than having an option to distribute to shareholders like a for-profit.

RideAustin CEO Joe Liemandt has said the new company wants to leverage this advantage to pay drivers more, while maintaining the low prices that customers have come to expect, according to Digital Trends, but details are still scarce. KUT reports that drivers will receive 80 percent of the fare, similar to Uber and Lyft, but RideAustin would charge $1.50 per mile, plus $.25 per minute: more than Uber, but less than a taxi.

The biggest difference will likely be RideAustin's scope and goals. The nonprofit is designed specifically for Austin, so it won't be aiming on expanding, and will abide by regulation requirements.

The app is coming equipped with ways to easily donate to a rider's choice of local charities, including a feature that allows customers to round up the fare to the nearest dollar and donate the difference.

Many questions remain unanswered. One of the biggest, however, is for Uber and Lyft: if their ultimate negotiation tactic is leaving, what happens if RideAustin or another ride-hailing provider succeeds in filling the void?

[Editor's note: This story originally failed to note that WingzAround is a beta service.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to RideAustin: Can a nonprofit do what Uber and Lyft could not?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2016/0524/RideAustin-Can-a-nonprofit-do-what-Uber-and-Lyft-could-not
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe