To the victor in Egypt's presidential race: a terrible economy

The Muslim Brotherhood has fronted a candidate. A former ally of Mubarak may even run. But whoever wins will start with less than half the foreign reserves Egypt had before the revolution.

The Muslim Brotherhood, after months of denials of interest in the presidency, nominated one of its own for the presidency of Egypt this weekend. In Cairo yesterday, rumors were flying that Omar Suleiman, the retired general who emerged as one of Hosni Mubarak's closest confidants in the final years of his rule, was priming for a run of his own.

Meanwhile, secularists have all but abandoned the body tasked with writing Egypt's new constitution (with a hard-to-believe deadline of one month from now – don't bet on it), angry that the committee is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood and their uneasy Islamist allies from the salafi Nour Party.

Egypt's political transition has gotten even messier and more dysfunctional (hard to believe) in recent weeks, and takes real expertise to untangle (for an excellent piece looking at some of the complexity of the presidential race, start here).

But there's one solid fact that will confront whoever wins the presidency and that won't be addressed by the most brilliant and fair constitution in human history: Egypt's economy is in really, really bad shape.

Both foreign and domestic investment has dried up in the past year, while the economy stagnates and the population continues to grow. Millions of Egyptians rely on subsidized bread and fuel to just get by from day to day, and those subsidies put massive strains on government coffers. The latest reminder of that was the release of foreign reserve figures yesterday. Bloomberg reports that Egypt's foreign reserves fell to $15.1 billion in March from $15.7 billion at the end of February. The good news is that was the smallest month-on-month decline since Mubarak was ousted in February 2010. But that's still a 3.8 percent decline, and less than half of the $36 billion Egypt's central bank had in December of 2011, before the uprising against Hosni Mubarak began.

The country currently has enough foreign cash on hand to cover about three months of imports. And this isn't about imports of foreign cars or Hollywood movies. Egypt is the largest wheat importer in the world, with about half of the country's grain coming from outside. For nationalistic reasons, Egypt rebuffed a $3 billion loan offered by the World Bank on really sweet terms last June. The country's current military-backed cabinet is now seeking the same amount of money from the International Monetary Fund.

The hitch? The deal probably won't be signed until June – and even then, the IMF is seeking broad statements of support from political forces like the Muslim Brotherhood in exchange. The Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party, which won the most seats in parliamentary elections, has been leery of outside forces and have occasionally launched broadsides against foreign interference. (And some of its leaders have expressed a desire to strictly limit alcohol sales, something that could take a bite out of the country's $3 billion tourism industry.)

Hostility to foreign lenders like the IMF and World Bank is quite popular in Egypt, so that makes political sense. But the country is in desperate need of cash. And that's a reality that's going to confront Egypt, no matter who wins the presidency.

Follow Dan Murphy on Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to To the victor in Egypt's presidential race: a terrible economy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2012/0403/To-the-victor-in-Egypt-s-presidential-race-a-terrible-economy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe