Skip to footer

US hurdler Lolo Jones responds to harsh media criticism

The US medal hopeful in the women's 100-meter hurdles went on NBC's 'Today' show and talked about a recent New York Times article.

|
Mark Blinch/REUTERS
Australia's Sally Pearson (L) crosses the finish line ahead of Dawn Harper of the U.S. and Lolo Jones of the U.S. (C) to win the women's 100m hurdles final during the London 2012 Olympic Games at the Olympic Stadium August 7.
  • By Associated Press

| London

With her voice choking and eyes welling with tears, U.S. hurdler Lolo Jones took issue with what she called "heartbreaking" criticism a day after she barely missed winning an Olympic medal,

Jones appeared on NBC's "Today" on Wednesday and was asked about a recent story in The New York Times that said her stardom had more to do with marketing than her accomplishments on the track.

"They just ripped me to shreds, and I just thought that that was crazy," Jones said.

She finished fourth in the 100-meter hurdles Tuesday, 0.10 seconds behind bronze medalist Kellie Wells. At Beijing four years ago, Jones was leading the final when she hit the ninth of 10 hurdles and wound up seventh.

"Putting your heart out there, obviously, it opens you up to a lot of negativity," Jones said.

The Times article said Jones has "received far greater publicity than any other American track and field athlete competing in the London Games. This was based not on achievement but on her exotic beauty and on a sad and cynical marketing campaign."

Jones is backed by big-name sponsors and has appeared on magazine covers, including a recent issue of "Time." Her charisma and childhood narrative — her family once lived in a church basement in Iowa — only add to her story.

She has no Olympic or world outdoor championship medals, but in her interview Wednesday she defended her record and her dedication to her sport.

"I work six days a week every day for four years for a 12-second race, and the fact that they just tore me apart, it was just heartbreaking," Jones said. "I am the American-record holder indoors. I have two world indoor titles and just because I don't boast about these things, I don't think I should be ripped apart by media.

"So, I mean, I laid it out there, I fought hard for my country, and I think it's just a shame that I have to deal with so much backlash when I'm already so brokenhearted as it is."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to US hurdler Lolo Jones responds to harsh media criticism
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Olympics/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0808/US-hurdler-Lolo-Jones-responds-to-harsh-media-criticism
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe