Gender equality may have reached the Olympic fields. But coaching is still a man’s game.

For the first time, the Paris Olympics will host an equal number of male and female competitors. But women striving to reach Olympic coaching levels still face bullying and discrimination. Barely 10% of the coaches at the Summer Games will be women.

|
Seth Wenig/AP
Mark Mitrovic and Emma Hayes, head coaches of the United States men’s and women’s Olympic soccer teams, bump fists during a news conference in New York, July 8, 2024.

The Paris Olympics will be the first Games to host an equal number of female and male competitors, but off the field it is another story with barely 1 in 10 coaches likely to be women.

Gold medal hopefuls trained by women include U.S. sprinter Gabby Thomas, British diver Tom Daley, British swimmer Adam Peaty, and Ukrainian high jumper Yaroslava Mahuchikh who set a new world record this month.

But while attitudes are changing, elite level coaching remains a predominantly male preserve.

“The main barrier is the good old boy’s club,” said French former world cycling champion and coach Marion Clignet, who helped carry the Olympic torch on its journey through France to Paris where the Games will open on July 26.

Her views were echoed by coaches from other sports with many saying women had to work twice as hard to be heard and often felt “overlooked and undervalued.”

Henriette Mero, a Norwegian triathlon coach, said bullying and discrimination by male coaches towards both female coaches and athletes were rife, but many women were reluctant to speak up for fear of losing their jobs.

She said the culture was so bad on her national team that she quit to focus on private coaching.

“We have a long way to go,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. “This is not unique to Norway. Coaches from other countries have told me the same.”

Other coaches said they had not encountered overt misogyny, but long anti-social hours and time away from home for training camps and competitions made it hard for women to juggle a top-level career with family responsibilities.

At the Tokyo Olympics – held in 2021 because of the COVID-19 pandemic – only 13% of accredited coaches were women, up from 11% in Rio 2016.

At the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, women accounted for 10% of coaches.

Vicky Huyton, founder of the Female Coaching Network, a global platform for women coaches to connect, said the underlying problem was systemic with sports “created by men for men.”

The father of the modern Olympic movement, Pierre de Coubertin, banned women from the first Games in 1896, later stating the Olympics were for the “exaltation of male athleticism” with “female applause as reward.”

Although women participated in a handful of events at the 1900 Olympics, it took another 112 years until they could compete in every sport. Meanwhile, the top jobs in international and national sports bodies continue to be male dominated.

“The power dynamics in sport have never really changed,” said Ms. Huyton. “And that hangover is why we see so few female performance directors and coaches in powerful positions.”

Getting women into top jobs

Many coaches said change had to start at the top with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), international sports federations, and national governing bodies.

IOC Vice President Nicole Hoevertsz, one of only four women to ever hold the post, said IOC President Thomas Bach was “very serious” about getting more women into prominent jobs.

“The important thing for me is not to keep the elevator up, but to send it down so more women can get to these leadership positions,” she added.

Ms. Hoevertsz said the IOC was working with sports bodies to open up more coaching roles to women. Sports leading the way included wrestling, skateboarding, judo, and taekwondo.

In 2019, the IOC began its WISH training program, which aims to equip women to coach at the highest level.

It has so far trained 123 female coaches – from 22 sports and 60 countries. At least six of them are heading to Paris.

Abuse scandals

Triathlon coach Ms. Mero said women coaches provided important role models for girls and young women.

She said many women athletes wanted female coaches, partly because they understand how women’s bodies work.

Menstrual cycles can affect performance, requiring nutrition and training to be adapted, and some sports injuries impact women differently than men.

Ms. Mero said female athletes may also prefer to talk to a female coach about body image issues and eating disorders, which affect some sports.

Several coaches suggested having more female coaches might reduce the risk of sexual abuse and harassment.

A growing number of athletes, including swimmers, gymnasts, and tennis players, have reported being harassed, molested, or raped by coaches. Sports hit by recent scandals include women’s basketball in Mali and snowboarding in the United States.

Multiple obstacles

Some barriers faced by women coaches reflect gender stereotypes.

A common complaint was that everyone – from stadium security to other coaches – assumed they were a physiotherapist, a mother, or someone else in a caring role.

Such biases were highlighted at the 2016 Rio Games when security guards blocked veteran athletics coach Ans Botha as she tried to get to the track to embrace South African sprinter Wayde van Niekerk after he smashed the 400m record to take gold.

Women coaches described incidents where they were undermined by male coaches or had their ideas dismissed in meetings only to be applauded when suggested by a man.

Modern pentathlon coach Nicola Robinson said she used the gender-neutral name Nic in emails.

“It makes my life easier,” she said. “I don’t want any preconceptions.”

Ms. Robinson, who also teaches a university sports coaching course, said a lack of role models was a factor behind the dearth of female coaches. Only 10-15% of her students are women.

“Seeing someone who has achieved it is crucial,” she added. “Boys see male coaches in the spotlight and think, ‘I’d love that as a job.’ But who is inspiring our girls?”

A further deterrent is the difficulty of combining elite coaching with motherhood.

“It’s a really tough challenge,” she said. “Swimming coaches start very early, but nurseries don’t open at 6 am. With athletics, you have training camps, but how easy is it for a mother to take two weeks away?”

To help women remain in coaching after starting families, Ms. Robinson said it should be made easier for them to bring young children to training camps and competitions with a partner or friend to assist – and this should be seen as normal.

Emily Handyside, a coach developer at the charity UK Coaching, which is trying to boost diversity in the profession, said another barrier was the lack of support and development for women coaches.

This was particularly true in sports like football where there is a big disparity in funding and resources between the men’s and women’s games.

Ms. Handyside said she was supporting a female football coach who had landed a prestigious role at a top club, but had no staff and was doing five different jobs – something a male coach at a similar career stage would not face.

“This is what we call a glass cliff,” she said. “She’s broken the glass ceiling, but a lack of resources and investment around the job mean there’s a high risk of failure or burnout. I hear this a lot.”

She said countries leading the way in trying to increase the number of women at the top include Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Britain.

But experts cautioned that providing women’s coach development programs was not enough – and a plethora of such initiatives risked creating a bottleneck of very qualified female coaches with nowhere to go.

The Female Coaching Network’s Ms. Huyton said recruitment often happened through informal channels and social networks, giving men an advantage. There was poor transparency in advertising roles and a lack of diversity on selection panels.

She called for international and national sports bodies to standardize and professionalize coach selection policies.

“We need to fix the system, not the women,” Ms. Huyton said.

This story was reported by The Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Gender equality may have reached the Olympic fields. But coaching is still a man’s game.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Olympics/2024/0712/Olympics-coaching-gender-inequality
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe