Letter from Manama: Israel-Hamas war stumps the experts

|
Hamad I Mohammed/Reuters
Delegates attend as Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi appears on a screen while speaking at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, Nov. 18, 2023.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 2 Min. )

This year’s edition of the Manama Dialogue, a conference convened by a British think tank that gathers everybody who is anybody in Middle East diplomatic and military circles, was intending to focus on cooperation.

Instead, participants talked about nothing but the war in Gaza. But they had more questions than answers when it came to “day-after” issues, such as who will run Gaza when the Israeli bombing stops.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Top Middle East diplomats and security experts, meeting last weekend, had more questions than answers about the future of their region after the war in Gaza.

Some even wondered whether the world might have reached another breaking point – “an Iraq moment,” as one Gulf diplomat put it – recalling the 2003 war that reshaped the region, deepened distrust of the West, and bolstered extremists.

But on one thing, everybody agreed. The killing has to stop.

Exasperated sighs and skeptical “hmm”s – these were the sounds of a conference on Middle East cooperation dominated by a war that few foresaw and even fewer know how to stop.

The scene was the annual Manama Dialogue hosted by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, an august British think tank. It was held last weekend in the capital of Bahrain, a sleepy but strategic Persian Gulf kingdom, welcoming senior diplomats, robed Gulf princes, decorated military officers, and analysts from around the world to the marble-floored Ritz Carlton.

The plan had been to discuss ways of working together to confront common challenges. Instead, participants – like the rest of the world – were stumped by the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Top Middle East diplomats and security experts, meeting last weekend, had more questions than answers about the future of their region after the war in Gaza.

Predictably, speakers condemned Hamas’ brutal Oct. 7 attack on Israel, called for the release of hostages, and urged Israel to halt its punishing military campaign in Gaza.

But it took only minutes for deep differences to boil to the surface.

It began when Brett McGurk, the Biden administration’s National Security Council coordinator for the Middle East, ruled out calls for a cessation of Israel’s military offensive and to end the war, saying that “calling for a cease-fire is not a path to peace.”

He was rebuked onstage and panned by eye-rolling conferencegoers during the coffee break. “Very unimpressive,” lamented one European diplomat.

“It is as if the Biden administration sees a different conflict and lives in a different world,” a Arab Gulf official told me.

Disillusioned Arab Gulf officials said the war had punctured their belief that they could make peace with Israel and normalize relations while leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict unresolved.

With palpable frustration in the air, Anwar Gargash, political adviser to Mohamed bin Zayed, president of the United Arab Emirates, openly wondered whether the world had reached “an Iraq moment,” referring to the 2003 war that reshaped the Middle East, deepened distrust of the West, and bolstered extremists. 

For hours, old peace process hands, highly skilled diplomats, and keen military strategists struggled with unanswered questions.

Israel’s military objective, to eradicate Hamas, was unachievable, they agreed. But what then?

All rejected the displacement of Palestinian residents of Gaza outside the strip and an Israeli reoccupation, but who, exactly, would take political and economic responsibility for a flattened Gaza Strip?

How would yet another attempt to revive a two-state solution be different from the dozens that have failed?  

As aproned staff carefully arranged porcelain cups and saucers ahead of the next coffee break, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi worried that debating postwar Gaza options in a glitzy hotel, even as war raged, was akin to watching “someone torching the whole place” but waiting for them to finish to say, “‘Now let’s put the fire out.’”

“We have to stop the killing.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Letter from Manama: Israel-Hamas war stumps the experts
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2023/1121/Letter-from-Manama-Israel-Hamas-war-stumps-the-experts
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe