Is Poland governed by the rule of law? The EU isn't so sure anymore.

Recent media and court legislation in Poland has prompted the EU to announce a preliminary investigation into the extent of the rule of law in the country on Wednesday.

|
Kacper Pempel/REUTERS
Polish Foreign Minister Witold Waszczykowski arrives for the weekly government meeting in Warsaw, Poland January, 2016. The new Polish government has stepped up efforts to address concerns in Brussels about civil rights ahead of a meeting on Wednesday at which the EU executive will review its moves to influence the constitutional court and the public broadcaster.

The European Union announced Wednesday that it would be conducting a preliminary "rule of law" assessment in Poland. This announcement comes on the heels of changes to state media and the constitutional court system in the country. 

Poland's conservative Law and Justice party replaced the more liberal Civic Platform party in 2015 elections. Since that time, the Law and Justice party and Poland's President Andrzej Duda have passed controversial legislation that significantly impacts Poland's media and court system. 

"Looking back over the last quarter of a century, one of the biggest successes of European integration," says Frans Timmermans, the European Commission's First Vice-President, "is the transformation of our new member states in Central and Eastern Europe away from dictatorship to fully fledged democracies."

In announcing its recent investigation into the state of the rule of law in Poland, the EU hopes to prevent a regression into what it sees as tendencies its members abandoned years ago.

In late December, Poland's parliament passed legislation that could limit the power of the country's Constitutional Tribunal. The new legislation would require a two-thirds majority of Poland's fifteen justices, rather than a simple majority, to rule on constitutional cases. It also requires each justice to be present at every hearing, thereby hampering the court's ability to hear cases

Earlier in December, the Law and Justice party faced suspicion over what critics saw as the hasty appointment of five justices and its refusal to acknowledge some of the appointments made by the previous administration.  

Tensions are compounded because those who oppose the Law and Justice party see the Constitutional Tribunal as the only way to counter the party's legislative changes

The new media law provides for the immediate removal of current state radio and television heads from their positions, and transfers the ability to appoint new heads from an independent TV and radio committee to the treasury minister. 

Although other EU leaders were immediately concerned by the passage of this media legislation, presidential aide Małgorzata Sadurska asserted that the president signed the legislation to preserve the impartiality and objectivity of state media

Mr. Timmermans sent a letter in December to Polish government officials, expressing his concern. Others have indicated for months that they are worried about Poland's shift to the right; Politico's Europe edition reports that Washington has contacted Warsaw about the matter and that press freedom groups such as Reporters Without Borders have issued statements condemning Poland's legislation.

Although the EU has long expressed its support for democratic principles among member states, its concern for rule of law issues in Europe has heightened since 2014, when it was accused of failing to protect liberal values in Hungary

In 2014, Hungary's President Viktor Orbán showed what many see as a lack of concern for what officials like Mr. Timmermans consider the EU's fundamental democratic principles. In response to accusations that his government was stifling democracy with policies that intimidate the media and pack the courts, Mr. Orbán said, “I don’t think that our European Union membership precludes us from building an illiberal new state based on national foundations."

On the contrary, Timmermans argues that EU membership very much precludes illiberality. Preserving democratic principles, Timmermans said last week, is "a collective responsibility, not just of the member states, but of the union as a whole." Orbán's policies in 2014 forced the EU to examine its procedures for evaluating member states compliance with the rule of law. The EU's preliminary investigation in Poland is the first time the three-stage process has been used

Consequences for Poland could be severe. If the media law is not repealed, Poland could lose its voting rights on the European Council. It could also lose its ability to participate in the much-beloved Eurovision song contest. 

At this stage, however, the EU is not accusing Poland. Its decision to conduct a preliminary investigation of the situation in Poland was made out of a desire to open a dialogue, rather than indict. Said Timmermans in a press release, "Our aim is to solve these issues; our aim is not to accuse, to go into a polemic. Our aim is to solve the issues in a rational way based on our legal obligations."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is Poland governed by the rule of law? The EU isn't so sure anymore.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0113/Is-Poland-governed-by-the-rule-of-law-The-EU-isn-t-so-sure-anymore
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe