Why is ISIS blowing up history?

This summer, the Islamic State group intensified its systematic destruction of treasured ruins, destroying pieces of the ancient city of Palmyra. They claim to be destroying idols, but is that the whole story?

|
Reuters
The temple of Baal Shamin in Palmyra, Syria (pictured in 2009), which the Islamic State blew up in late August. The Islamic State destroyed several ancient temples in Palmyra this summer, intensifying its ongoing campaign against pre-Islamic relics.

Last May, as Islamic State (IS) fighters swept into Palmyra, Syria, a UNESCO World Heritage site, they promised to protect the city’s emblematic ruins, a glimpse into Roman-era history. Archaeologists, who spent years miserably watching as war and terrorism took their toll on the Middle East’s artifacts, breathed a sigh of relief.

The promise was short-lived. In the past few weeks, IS has gone on one of their most devastating sprees of destruction, demolishing several of Palmyra’s 2,000-year-old temples and tombs. 

The violence is aimed not just at artifacts, but people, too. On Aug. 18, they gruesomely executed Palmyra’s retired chief of antiquities Khalid al-Asaad after interrogating him about valuable artifacts. A nearby Roman amphitheater, although still standing, was used as the dramatic backdrop to film other executions. 

Islamic State is well known for its violence against people who stand in their way, or disagree with the group’s strict beliefs. But why has it become equally well known for demolishing silent, ancient, and very valuable ruins across Iraq and Syria, artifacts from long-abandoned faiths?

The simplest explanation may be shock value. UNESCO has called the destruction of sites like Palmyra an “intolerable crime against civilization,” and the attention its videos inevitably draw serves to recruit admirers and horrify enemies. As The New York Times noted in late August, IS sometimes uses such videos as distractions from its military defeats. 

Money is strongly suspected to be a motive, as well. Several academics question whether the Islamic State group may be destroying replicas, or blowing up dramatic ruins in order to hide their excavation of valuable artifacts beneath. As The Washington Post reports, IS has even dedicated a bureaucratic department to the excavation industry

Perhaps the most confusing reason, however, is religion. IS frequently claims that the relics it destroys are un-Islamic, but the targets of their attacks are sometimes Muslim artifacts and Muslim people.

The group's particular notion of what is "un-Islamic" stems from their unique strain of Wahhabism, the official faith of Saudi Arabia. Unlike other forms of Islam, which encourage clerics to draw analogies from the Quran to guide life today, Wahhabism insists on literal, strict interpretations. If Muhammad destroyed idols, then, IS believes it is their duty to tear down any pre-Islamic artifacts, or Muslim art and architecture that does not comply with Wahhabism’s narrow vision. 

Even before the Islamic State attack on Palmyra, UNESCO director general Irina Bokova warned that their campaign of destruction had “reached unprecedented levels in modern history.” Syria has thousands of archaeological sites, which preserve what Ms. Bokova calls the “diversity and richness” of the ancient Middle East, “the crossroads of several civilizations” – the complexity IS wishes to literally erase.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why is ISIS blowing up history?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0904/Why-is-ISIS-blowing-up-history
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe