Skip to footer

Iran offers to mediate US political conflict. Not.

The latest from the New Yorker's Andy Borowitz, had the Twittersphere in stitches. Did his satire prove a point?

|
Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP
In this picture released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei addresses a group of environmental officials and activists at his residence in Tehran, Iran on Sunday. The New Yorker's Andy Borowitz wrote a satirical piece where he said the Supreme Leader offered to mediate talks between President Obama and Senate Republicans

Calls to Kim Jong-un to mediate the schism between the Obama Administration and Senate Republicans apparently went unanswered. Fidel Castro is too focused on MLB spring training to be bothered. And Vladimir Putin is, well, busy managing the takeover of eastern Ukraine. 

These are not necessarily the first world leaders who come to mind when the phrase "peace-brokers" is mentioned, but that is the spirit in which the New Yorker's Andy Borowitz wrote his latest column. The satirical column portrayed Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as extending a hand of peace and offering to mediate talks between President Obama and Republican senators.

This comes on the heels of an open letter signed by 47 of the 54 Republican senators sent to the Iranian regime. The letter said that any nuclear agreement finalized with the Persian republic under the remaining days of President Obama's tenure could be rendered null and void, "with a stroke of a pen."

While some have questioned the motivation behind sending this letter to the Iranians – saying it could undermine a high-level diplomatic negotiation – the column puts the issue in a different light. By writing from Iran's perspective, Borowitz provides a tongue-in-cheek focus to the impasse between the president and Senate Republicans: 

“Tensions between these two historic enemies have been high in recent years, but we believe they are now at a boiling point,” Khamenei said. “As a result, Iran feels it must offer itself as a peacemaker.”

He said that his nation was the “logical choice” to jumpstart negotiations between Obama and the Republicans because “it has become clear that both sides currently talk more to Iran than to each other.”

The Borowitz column sent the Twitterverse buzzing with most reactions appreciating his humor, and many thought the headline was a creation of the satirical news publication "The Onion." A few expressed outrage that a comedian would use his platform to compare Washington gridlock to the Iranian government. 

Had Borowitz's headline been true this would not have been Iran's first attempt at diplomatic mediation. According to the Global Post, President Hassan Rouhani had actually offered to host North and South Korean officials in Iran in hopes of spurring renewed negotiations between the separated neighbors in early 2014. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Iran offers to mediate US political conflict. Not.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0311/Iran-offers-to-mediate-US-political-conflict.-Not
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe