Germany can’t balance its budget. Now its government is in free fall.

Germany’s governing coalition fell apart on Nov. 6 after Chancellor Olaf Scholz tried to push through a plan to borrow more money in support of the Ukrainian war effort. Years of tension peaked when the fiscally conservative Free Democrats jumped ship.

|
Annegret Hilse/Reuters
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz attends a media briefing at the Chancellery after firing Finance Minister Christian Lindner following a meeting with the heads of the governing coalition in Berlin, Nov. 6, 2024.

German opposition parties and business groups on Nov. 7 urged Chancellor Olaf Scholz to trigger new elections quickly after his rocky three-way coalition collapsed and plunged the country into political turmoil.

The coalition fell apart on Nov. 6 when years of tensions reached their peak in a disagreement over how to plug a multi-billion-euro hole in the budget and how to revive Europe’s largest economy, which is headed for its second year of contraction.

The break-up creates a leadership vacuum at the heart of Europe just as it seeks to form a united response to the Nov. 5 election of Republican Donald Trump to a second term as U.S. president on issues ranging from possible new U.S. trade tariffs to Russia’s war in Ukraine and the future of the NATO alliance.

Mr. Scholz delayed his departure for the European Union summit in Budapest on Nov. 7 due to the crisis at home and canceled his attendance at the next United Nations climate change summit.

Mr. Scholz, of the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), said he fired his finance minister from the fiscally conservative Free Democrats (FDP) for opposing his plan to suspend the debt brake again in order to raise more funds for Ukraine and the economy.

That led to the FDP withdrawing from the government, leaving Mr. Scholz’s SPD and the Greens. The chancellor said he would hold a confidence vote in January, which he would likely lose, triggering new elections by the end of March – six months ahead of elections originally scheduled for September.

Joerg Kukies, a top official in the German chancellery and close SPD ally of Mr. Scholz, will be named finance minister.

Friedrich Merz, leader of the opposition conservatives who are leading in nationwide polls, called for a vote of confidence immediately, “by the beginning of next week at the latest.”

Elections could take place in the second half of January next year, Mr. Merz said. His comments were echoed by other opposition parties.

“We simply cannot afford to have a government without a majority in Germany for several months now, followed by an election campaign for several more months and then possibly several weeks of coalition negotiations,” he told reporters.

“Time is of the essence.”

The FDP’s exit will likely also spell the departure of the government’s transatlantic coordinator who has spent months cultivating ties with senior U.S. Republicans ahead of the prospect of a Trump return to the White House.

German industry, reeling from high costs and fierce Asian competition, also urged Mr. Scholz’s government on Nov. 7 to arrange snap elections as soon as possible.

“Especially in these challenging times, we need a solution-oriented federal government capable of taking action,” said Wolfgang Grosse Entrup, who heads the VCI lobby group for Germany’s key pharma and chemicals sector. “We cannot afford a months-long standstill and political deadlock.”

Blessing in disguise?

Mr. Merz said he would press Mr. Scholz to speed up the confidence vote in his meeting with him on Nov. 7.

Mr. Scholz may have to heed those calls given that, due to his coalition’s demise, he will have to rely on cobbled-together parliamentary majorities to pass any serious measures.

The political crisis comes at a critical juncture for Germany, with a flatlining economy, aging infrastructure, and an unprepared military. It is likely to deal another blow to consumption and investment in coming months, economists said.

But the crisis could also be a “blessing” in the long-run given the tensions that had plagued this coalition, the first of its kind at national level, said ING economist Carsten Brzeski.

“Elections and a new government could and should end the current paralysis of an entire country and offer new and clear policy guidance and certainty,” he said.

Still the rise of both leftist and rightist populist parties in Germany, as elsewhere in Europe, however, means that even with new elections, the country could struggle to form a coherent coalition with a strong parliamentary majority.

“You don’t have to be a clairvoyant to deduce ... that things will not automatically become easier in the future, even after the next election,” said Economy Minister and Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck of the Greens.

This story was reported by Reuters. Reuters writers Rachel More, Matthias Williams, Holger Hansen, Andreas Rinke, and Sarah Marsh contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Germany can’t balance its budget. Now its government is in free fall.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2024/1107/olaf-scholz-German-coalition-collapses-debt-Ukraine
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe