MH17 amps up 'he said, she said' in Russian and Ukrainian media

Strange rumors, unsubstantiated claims, and the blame game between Russian and Ukrainian media persists as the world demands answers over MH17.

|
Sergei Chuzavkov/AP
People hold candles and place flower tributes placed outside the Dutch embassy to commemorate victims of Malaysia Airlines plane crash in Kiev, Ukraine, Thursday, July 17, 2014.

The information war between Russia and Ukraine took on an even more high-stakes game of "he said, she said" today, with rumors and unsubstantiated claims circulating about the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine.

The media war between the neighboring countries has been going on for months, with Russian media labeling the protesters on Kiev's Maidan Square as fascists. Russia's annexation of Crimea and the Ukrainian government's battle against separatists only exacerbated the cross-border media battle.

US officials are eying Russia-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine as responsible for yesterday's plane crash. However, many media groups in Russia are continuing to toe the Kremlin line.

In Russia, media organizations have followed President Vladimir Putin's lead in blaming Ukraine for the deadly attack on the Boeing 777. A piece from Russian newspaper Kommersant sums up the situation saying, “Donetsk Republic authorities and Ukrainian authorities blame each other for hitting the plane."

There have also been outlandish claims, including that Ukrainian forces shot down the plane because they thought it belonged to Mr. Putin. According to several Russian-language news sources, rebel commander and Russian citizen Igor Girkin (who goes by the nom de guerre Strelkov) alleged that several of the bodies found at the crash site appeared to have been dead for several days, implying that Ukraine was trying to create a set-up and blame Russia. 

English-language Kremlin-backed news channel RT repeated claims that the target was Putin’s airplane. Sarah Firth, a correspondent for RT, publicly resigned from the network telling The Guardian, “When this story broke that was the moment I knew I had to go.” She worked for RT for five years. 

Not all Russian media were quick to point fingers. In a piece for Russian website Znak, Andrey Kozenko writes about the plane crash and the generally polarized views people have of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Mr. Kozenko implored readers to reflect on the language used by Russian media to describe events like this crash. He writes:

“It is not just a crime, it is a split of different civilizations. And we are not on the side of normal people. Now we’ll be taken differently in the world. Yes, we didn’t shoot the plane and we are not armed. But normal people are on one side and we are on the other, together with our armed clowns…. Now let us live with it.”

And Ukraine says ... the opposite

Ukrainian news media, on the other hand, have placed blame on Russian separatists and the Kremlin. After months of conflict between the two nations, some commentators are now using blatantly exasperated tones in their coverage of the crash.

Oleh Tyahnybok, leader of the far-right Ukrainian party Svoboda, penned an opinion piece on website Ukrainian Pravda titled “For the destruction of the passenger plane Putin is personally responsible.”

Mr. Tyahnybok calls for the implementation of martial law, and places blame squarely on Putin's shoulders, writing: “This [downing of the plane] is just one of many crimes committed by Russian terrorists during the military aggression of Russia against Ukraine that has already lasted more than five months.” 

Channel 5, a popular Ukrainian TV network owned by current President Petro Poroshenko, published a piece on its website that highlights the blame game approach of both Russian and Ukrainian media:

“The first headlines of leading media came out with direct hints that the cause of the tragedy is found in Moscow. Russian terrorists quickly started erasing proof that they shot the airliner. The entire propaganda machine of the Kremlin has already tried to shift the blame of the tragedy on Ukraine.”

Meanwhile, many Ukrainian commentators are spending time questioning the allegations made in Russian media.

“What is the reason that Ukraine would want to shoot down a plane over its territory? … I don’t understand how we can take seriously Putin’s proclamations and his team and his marionettes" in eastern Ukraine, Ukranian blogger Karlo Volokh said in an interview on Ukrainian network TVi.

Translations from the Russian by Olga Podolskaya. Translations from Ukrainian by Lydia Tomkiw.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to MH17 amps up 'he said, she said' in Russian and Ukrainian media
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0718/MH17-amps-up-he-said-she-said-in-Russian-and-Ukrainian-media
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe