By razor-thin margin, Swiss voters back tighter curbs on immigration

Sunday's referendum was a close-run race that has raised questions over the European Union's push for flexible labor markets. 

|
Thomas Hodel/Reuters
Swiss Interior Minister Alain Berset (l.) talks to Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga during a news conference in Bern February 9. Swiss voters on Sunday narrowly backed proposals to reintroduce immigration quotas with the European Union.

A narrow win in a Swiss referendum to implement strict quotas on European Union citizens is another sign of how the issue of migration is dividing Europe. With almost all ballots counted, 50.3% of voters favored the measure. 

Switzerland is not part of the 28-member EU, but it adopts many of its policies. The clearest example is giving residence permits to most EU citizens. 

Now the Swiss have decided that a freedom of movement policy, in effect since 2007, was misguided. Some 80,000 foreigners enter Switzerland each year, ten times more than initial projections. The right-wing Swiss People’s Party, which led calls for the referendum, claim that foreigners are straining public services and driving salaries down. The conversation has grown more heated in the wake of Europe's economic crisis, which has led Italians and Spaniards to move to stronger economies in the north.

Last spring Switzerland invoked a clause in its migration policy that allows for a cap on residence permits for western Europeans, as the Monitor reported in this story. The issue has electrified Swiss voters. According to the Wall Street Journal, today's referendum saw the fifth-biggest turnout since 1971, the year Switzerland gave women the right to vote.

In the run-up to the vote, Swiss government and business groups argued that migration is key to a dynamic labor market that draws on the best talent across the continent.

This is a familiar debate across Europe these days, especially since Jan. 1 when the restrictions on Bulgarians and Romanians were lifted in several EU countries with strong labor markets. 

“Benefits tourism” has become a new buzzword: Politicians in the UK, Netherlands, and Germany have voiced concerns over a tide of Bulgarians and Romanians in their hospitals, schools, and welfare offices.

Switzerland’s clampdowns on migration have tested the country’s ties with the EU, and today’s results will cause more friction. The "yes" vote will also give more wind to the euro-skepticism gaining ground across Europe, which will likely be on display during EU parliamentary elections in May.

Since the founding of the EU, rules on freedom of movement have gotten progressively more liberal, giving EU citizens almost all the same rights as nationals in the countries where they reside. The founding idea behind this policy was that dissolving barriers would create a flexible and functional labor market.

The hostile rhetoric has shone a harsh spotlight on this principle. However, Laszlo Andor, the EU's commissioner for employment, social affairs, and inclusion, recently told the Monitor that the reality is that Europe should anticipate more migration in coming years. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to By razor-thin margin, Swiss voters back tighter curbs on immigration
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0209/By-razor-thin-margin-Swiss-voters-back-tighter-curbs-on-immigration
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe