France presidential elections: the candidates challenging Sarkozy

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is fighting for reelection in the April 22 presidential poll. Here are the top 5 presidential candidates.

2. François Hollande

Thomas Richard/Reuters
François Hollande, Socialist Party candidate for the 2012 French presidential election, reacts to supporters after his speech at a political rally at Mont-de-Marsan on March 29, 2012.

In a twist of history, the Socialist candidate François Hollande (polling at 27 percent) will likely face Sarkozy in a run-off – just as Royal, the mother of his four children and former partner, did in 2007.

Hollande is running as “Mr. Normal” – the quiet man, in contrast with Sarkozy’s style more showy or aggressive style that has hurt his popularity among many French. Hollande describes himself as on the center left – “pink,” rather than the “red” radical left. He has strongly criticized “big finance” but has also  earned plaudits from small and medium-sized business owners, who see his economic approach as pragmatic.

He was born in the northern France town of Rouen in 1954. His father was a doctor and his mother was a social worker. He attended Paris’s elite Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) that has been the postwar feeder school for most top French leaders and cut his political teeth in the heady leftist 1968 student movement.

He is a top political thinker and policy maker and became the leader of the Socialist party in 1997. He’s been a member of the National Assembly, the lower house of the French parliament, but has not held a top position nor cabinet spot – even as Ms. Royal, who he met at ENA, climbed the ranks as a protégé of former president François Mitterrand.

The Socialists have not held power for 17 years and Hollande did not emerge as their candidate of choice until former IMF director Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s sex scandal took him out of the race. Hollande shed 40 pounds and a pudgy profile in preparation for the bid.

Unlike Strauss-Kahn, Hollande has little foreign experience and his views remain vague (he says he will “work out” withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year). His supporters note that Sarkozy had no foreign policy experience prior to the presidency either.

Hollande’s strength is a grassroots connection to French society. If elected, he was vowed to shift Europe’s current austerity policy toward one of growth. He favors bonds issued by the European Central Bank as a way to finance infrastructure building and says he will renegotiate the EU’s German-led “fiscal compact” if elected.

He wants to impose higher taxes on banks and spend more on education. To cut away at some of Melanchon’s popularity on the left, Hollande announced a 75 percent tax rate on income above $1.3 million, athough the effect is inconsequential. At the end of March, Hollande was 1.5 points behind Sarkozy in first-round elections and nine points ahead in the second and final round.

4 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.