Indian election: Exit polls point to Modi-led coalition landslide

Narendra Modi's right-wing BJP appears headed for an election victory that would not require additional coalition partners. Official results are due Friday. 

|
Ahmad Masood/REUTERS
People wait to cast their vote at a polling station in the final phase of the general election in Varanasi in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, May 12, 2014.

Right-wing Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi appeared headed for a startling victory in India’s parliamentary elections, according to exit polls released Monday night. 

The coalition headed by Mr. Modi may have won an unexpected outright majority, freeing him of the need to form alliances, according to one of the polls. Analysts cautioned, however, that exit polls have proved unreliable in past Indian elections.

The official results from India's staggered election, of which today's polling was the final stage, are due on Friday. It they are close to the exit poll figures they will mark a remarkable victory for Modi, one of the most divisive figures in Indian politics.

Indian TV stations, which had been forbidden to publish their exit polls until after the close of polling, projected Modi’s NDA coalition winning between 261 and 289 seats in the new parliament. The threshold for an absolute majority is 272 seats. If the exit polls are correct, this would be the first time an Indian government would enjoy such power for nearly 30 years. [Editor's note: The original version of this story misstated the name of Modi's coalition.]

The putative results were a grave disappointment for the ruling Congress party and its allies, whose support seems to have slumped in the wake of rising inflation and a slew of corruption scandals. They indicate that Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its allies got 38 percent of the vote, up 12 percent from the 2009 general elections. The Congress party and its allies won 26 percent, down 7 percent in the same period. Other parties, mostly regional ones, won 36 percent, down 5 percent. The results suggest that the BJP to a certain extent polarized the Hindu vote. 

The BJP has refrained from claiming victory, however. “Exit polls are not exact polls,” says senior BJP leader Harsh Vardhan. “Let us wait until May 16th  to know the results.”

The BJP ran a massive, well-funded electoral campaign promoting Modi as its candidate for prime minister in presidential fashion. He focused his message relentlessly on a promise of development and economic growth.

Modi “has somewhere touched the pulse of the Indian electorate and negative feelings about the Congress party have metamorphosed into positive support for him,” says political analyst Neerja Chowdhury. “He is appealing because there is a mood for change and anger at the incumbent government."

Modi is controversial because, as chief minister of the state of Gujarat in 2002, he was accused of not doing enough to halt Hindu rioters in the state who killed around 2,000 people, mostly Muslims.

Charges that he actively encouraged the massacre were not substantiated by a Supreme Court investigation, but Muslim voters have been nervous about the prospect of his forming a government.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Indian election: Exit polls point to Modi-led coalition landslide
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2014/0512/Indian-election-Exit-polls-point-to-Modi-led-coalition-landslide
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe