Indian diplomat heads home, but India's anger is likely to linger

India's Foreign Ministry announced it was expelling a US diplomat from New Delhi. The standoff over an indicted diplomat has exposed deeper US-India tensions.

|
Rajanish Kakade/AP
Indian activists of an organization called Dalit Cobra shout slogans during a protest outside the U.S. consulate in Mumbai, India, Jan. 7, 2014. The arrest of Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade in New York, arrested and strip-searched for allegedly forcing her maid to toil for little pay, sparked a diplomatic furor between the United States and India.

The Indian diplomat whose arrest in New York sparked a diplomatic row is on her way back home, but the bid to ease tensions isn’t settled just yet. 

The dispute over the wages the diplomat was paying to her Indian household help in New York has left the India-US relationship badly frayed. The sense that this is possibly the lowest point the two countries have faced in recent years is widespread in New Delhi, and Indian analysts believe it will take time to repair. 

“Ms. Khobragade's return should end the public spat over the issue, but diplomats of the two countries will need to revert to quietly resolving some of the diplomatic issues raised by the episode,” says retired Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, former director of the Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses in New Delhi. 

The Indian government today ordered the United States to remove one of its diplomats from New Delhi, hours after a deal last night that US officials hoped was a facesaving measure for both sides.

Ms. Khobragade was granted diplomatic immunity, meeting India’s demands. But before that occurred, she was indicted by a US federal grand jury in Manhattan on charges of visa fraud. The US court indictment papers charge that Khobragade lied on her visa papers and made her maid work 100-hour weeks for about one-seventh the US minimum wage.

To some Indian observers, the delay in resolving the situation suggests a dismissiveness toward India that is troubling. 

“The solution reached now could have been reached several days ago. But to let the issue fester for a month, for a country the United States calls a strategic partner, is unusual,” says Lalit Mansingh, former Indian ambassador to the United States. "That it was allowed to become so messy shows the United States doesn't care about India and makes you wonder if the Indo-U.S. strategic relationship is still alive or not."

Repairing the relationship will not be easy, because India has gone to extreme limits in applying local laws to American diplomats in response to the US insistence that local laws apply to Indian consular staff. These include asking the US Embassy not to host film screenings without a license, barring them from importing alcohol, and effectively ordering that a club run by the American embassy be shut down.

“This incident demonstrates that the relationship existed more at the political level than at the diplomatic level. It is as if the diplomats on both sides decided the relationship wasn't strategic enough to show more courtesy and grace,” says Samir Saran, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi think tank. 

The relationship of the United States with New Delhi has warmed significantly since President Clinton visited India in 2000. Prior to that, India had been closer to the former Soviet Union, and it defied the world with nuclear tests in 1997. India-US ties grew after 9/11, though more recently, strains have emerged over India's delayed implementation of the India-US civil nuclear energy deal and the slowing down of trade relations.

Chances are slim that the relationship will return to normal in a hurry. US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz postponed his trip to India this month, India will hold general elections this spring, and the opposition Bhartiya Janata Party's candidate for the post of prime minister, Narendra Modi, is currently barred from getting a US visa for allegedly looking the other way as Hindu mobs killed at least 1,200 Muslims in Gujarat in 2002. Should Mr. Modi become prime minister, a strong possibility, the Khobragade imbroglio may seem like a much lesser embarrassment for the bilateral relationship.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Indian diplomat heads home, but India's anger is likely to linger
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2014/0110/Indian-diplomat-heads-home-but-India-s-anger-is-likely-to-linger
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe