Bin Laden hide-out: Leaks suggest Pakistani officers knew

Bin Laden hide-out: Material from WikiLeaks suggests mid-ranking Pakistani Army officials may have known about the Osama bin Laden hide-out in Pakistan, but official US statements do not back that up.

|
Anjum Naveed/AP/File
In this May 2011 file photo, media and local residents gather outside the Osama bin Laden hide-out where he was caught and killed, in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

Leaked e-mails from the US intelligence firm Stratfor suggest Osama bin Laden may have been in regular contact with Pakistani military and intelligence agents prior to his death in May last year.

Whistleblowing organization WikiLeaks published 5 million internal e-mails of the Texas-based company Monday, though Stratfor has refused to comment on the contents of the leaks.

In one e-mail, a Stratfor employee is quoted as saying “Mid to senior level ISI and Pak Mil with one retired Pak Mil General that had knowledge of the OBL arrangements and safe house." Stratfor analyzes world events for corporations and government agencies.

The e-mail goes on to suggest that up to 12 agents may have been in the loop, but does not name them. The employee adds that the US could use the information as a bargaining chip after the raid, which took place in the garrison town of Abbottabad and created an uproar inside Pakistan as well as a great deal of embarrassment to Pakistani intelligence agencies.

Authorities began demolishing the compound last weekend, in what analysts called an effort to wash away a reminder of that embarrassment.

It’s not clear how credible the information contained in the e-mails is, with some observers speculating that, because Stratfor itself did not publish the data, they may have not deemed the intelligence report authentic.

Pakistan’s Army spokesman, Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, dismissed the e-mails. “It’s rubbish and tantamount to kite flying, much farther from the truth,” he told the Monitor.

In the aftermath of the raid, in which Navy SEALs collected computers and other intelligence from the compound, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he had seen “no evidence at all” that senior Pakistani intelligence officers had information on the raid, adding "in fact, I've seen some evidence to the contrary." In her first trip to Pakistan since the raid, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said that the US had “absolutely no evidence that anyone at the highest level of the Pakistani government” knew where Mr. bin Laden was.

According to Rifaat Hussain, head of the department of defense and strategic studies at the Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad, the allegations lack credibility because the American government has not itself accused Pakistan’s intelligence agencies directly.

“There are many people who can claim they knew of his whereabouts, but there is no way to verify that,” he says, adding that the leaks are part of a campaign of disinformation against Pakistan.

The leaks come at a time when US-Pakistan relations, stuck in a rut since the raid, are getting back on track, says Amir Rana, a strategic analyst at the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies.

“Whether it has credibility or not, I don’t think it will have any negative effect on the improving US-Pak relations,” he says, referring to a meeting between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar in London last week.

“Things are coming on track and I don’t think the US will now comment on this,” he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bin Laden hide-out: Leaks suggest Pakistani officers knew
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2012/0228/Bin-Laden-hide-out-Leaks-suggest-Pakistani-officers-knew
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe