Knife attack at Chinese train station injures six

The knife attack in the southern city of Guangzhou was the third such incident since March. Suspicion has fallen on China's Uighur minority, though facts are thin on the ground.

|
AP
In this photo taken by a mobile phone, a suspected assailant is taken away after being subdued in an attack at a railway station in Guangzhou in south China's Guangdong province Tuesday, May 6, 2014. Six people were stabbed today in the knife attack at Guangzhou station in southern China, according to official media.

China is once again scrambling for answers in the wake of another ferocious train station attack, the third in as many months.

Six people were stabbed today in the knife attack at Guangzhou station in southern China, according to official media. Police said they shot and injured one male assailant, but eyewitnesses told Chinese media there were at least two knife-wielding attackers and possibly more. The one suspect is reportedly hospitalized in Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong Province, a manufacturing hub that is a magnet for migrants from across China. 

Suspicion for the attack has fallen on Uighurs, a Muslim Turkic ethnic group from the far west province of Xinjiang. Witnesses told Chinese media the assailants were wearing “small white hats,” which could indicate they were part of a Muslim minority. White skullcaps are commonly worn by Uighurs and other Muslims in Xinjiang and other parts of China. 

However, as with the earlier attacks, police and government officials have kept a tight lid on information and heavily censored online speculation and commentary.

Last week, a bombing killed three and injured 79 people at a train station in Urumqi, the Xinjiang capital. Two assailants were among the dead. President Xi Jinping, who was in the city at the time of the attack, pledged to stamp out terrorism with “decisive action.” Police said they are searching for a Uighur man in connection with that attack, but information remains sparse about both motives and suspects.

In March, a gang of eight knife-wielding attackers killed 29 people and injured 143 others at a train station in the southwestern city of Kunming. Police, who called the incident a terrorist attack perpetrated by Uighur separatists, shot four of the perpetrators. Witnesses reported a frenzied slashing attack that came without warning. 

More remains unknown than known about these attacks, however, largely thanks to China’s heavy hand in censoring its own media and controlling access to Xinjiang by foreign media. Though the province is technically open to journalists, reporters are heavily monitored there and sometimes sent packing as soon as they arrive. Local sources are watched and can be punished for speaking out.

Meanwhile, in comments likely to provoke the Chinese government, exiled Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer has urged authorities to look into the cause of Xinjiang's turmoil. China has in the past blamed Uighur unrest on outside forces stirring up dissent and is particularly fond of lambasting Ms. Kadeer, who heads the World Uyghur Congress. 

“I also call on the Chinese government to take complete responsibility for the failure of its ruthless policies, which is what led to this tragic outcome,” she told Radio Free Asia. “I ask the international community to look deep into the root causes which provoked this incident…. I call upon the international community to conduct a fact-finding investigation into this event.”

Uighurs have long complained of religious and cultural repression by the Chinese government. No organized group has claimed responsibility for this year's terror attacks or a suicide car bombing last year in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Knife attack at Chinese train station injures six
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2014/0506/Knife-attack-at-Chinese-train-station-injures-six
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe