Mongolia's top election issue: how to spend new riches

Mongolians vote for a new parliament today that will have to decide how the landlocked, still poor country should spend the expected windfall from its mining boom.

|
B Rentsendorj/REUTERS
People cast their votes at a polling station located in the outskirts of the Mongolian capital of Ulan Bator June 28.

Mongolians went to the polls Thursday as their remote but resource-rich country faces the possibility of economic triumph or disaster.

Mongolia's nearly 3 million people live atop $3 trillion worth of gold, copper, and coal. As foreign mining companies begin to extract this wealth, the resources could turn Mongolia – a former Soviet satellite state – into a new Qatar. But if the boom is badly handled, it might instead make the country into another Nigeria, plagued by corruption and poverty.

“The challenge for Mongolia’s newly elected leaders … will be to rise to the occasion and not squander the opportunity presented to bring prosperity to its citizens,” wrote former Mongolian Foreign Minister Nyamosor Tuya in a recent article for the Brookings Institution in Washington.

The government that emerges from today’s parliamentary elections will have to decide both how much of the national wealth it is ready to offer to foreign mining companies to attract their investment and how to share mining proceeds among the populace.

Left by the breakup of the Soviet Union with a devastated economy, Mongolian governments have been keen to encourage foreign investment, and they have offered generous terms to international mining giants such as Rio Tinto, Peabody, and China’s Shenhua.

Investment in projects such as the $7 billion Oyu Tolgoi copper mine, slated to come on line this summer, drove a GDP growth of 17 percent last year, the highest rate in Asia.

Both the leading political parties, however – the Mongolia People’s Party and the Democratic Party – have struck a tougher, more nationalist, stance during the election campaign, pledging to ensure that the state takes a larger share of future projects.

They are also promising to hand out more of the spoils to the citizenry, in a bid to appease growing popular resentment against an increasingly flagrant wealth gap.

Many Mongolians are nomadic yak and goat herders; hundreds of thousands of them have recently abandoned that lifestyle in the face of murderous winters and moved into slums around the capital Ulaanbataar. One third of the population lives below the poverty line. Yet Gucci, Prada, and Burberry, among other luxury brands, suffer no shortage of customers at their recently opened flagship stores.

“I don’t see any benefits” from mining, Altansetseg Laagansuren, a 20-something mother of three living in a ger (yurt) outside the capital told Reuters news agency recently. “I think the people at the top are sharing and eating up the wealth.”

Indeed, Transparency International, the anticorruption watchdog, ranks Mongolia 120  out of 183 nations.

The MPP and DP, which ruled in a coalition until last January “haven’t delivered what they promised,” former President Enkhbayar Nambar told the Ulan Bator Times last week. “Only a few people and a few families got much richer than ordinary families.”

Mr. Enkhbayar himself was arrested recently on corruption charges, which he says were fabricated in order to prevent him from running in today’s elections. His Mongolia People’s Revolutionary Party has mounted a strong challenge to the dominant centrist parties by pressing for national ownership of strategic resources.

Mongolian democracy has proved resilient since Ulaanbataar moved out of Moscow’s orbit in 1990; Thursday’s parliamentary elections will be the seventh of such polls. But the vote in 2008 was marred by riots following allegations of fraud, the declaration of a state of emergency, and the deaths of four protesters at the hands of police.

Politicians are anxious to avoid any repetition of such events; this time, the electoral authorities will be using, for the first time, an automated voting system designed to minimize the possibility of vote rigging.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Mongolia's top election issue: how to spend new riches
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0628/Mongolia-s-top-election-issue-how-to-spend-new-riches
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe