This Venezuelan mother hoped for asylum in the US. Now she is turning southward.

|
Marco Ugarte/AP
Migrants wait outside the Mexican Commission for Refugee Aid government office to apply for asylum in Mexico City, Jan. 28, 2025.

If President Donald Trump’s plan is to make the United States a wholly unwelcoming place for refuge, it may be working.

More than six months after leaving her home in Venezuela, passing through the dangerous Darién Gap and up through Central America before reaching Mexico, Yojani had hoped to seek asylum in the U.S.

But after Mr. Trump shut down one of the only viable ways for her family to do so his first day in office, Yojani and her husband have decided that the U.S. is no longer a land of stability or security.

Why We Wrote This

After President Donald Trump won a second term, the Monitor spoke with parents around the world about their hopes and fears for the future. Here we catch up with one parent – a Venezuelan mother – who made her way to Mexico, but is now preparing a reverse trek south.

“The U.S. has become hell for immigrants,” says the young mother, watching as her two children play with other migrants – from Honduras, Haiti, Ecuador – on the patio of a Catholic church in Mexico City’s historic center.

The Christian Science Monitor first spoke with Yojani, whose full name we aren’t publishing for her security, back in November after Mr. Trump clinched a second term in office. She was one of many parents around the world – from Israel to Russia to Gaza to China – who were calculating the risks that might come with a second Trump presidency. Not all parents were uniformly anti-Trump. Some hoped his administration would spell peace for Palestinians or Ukrainians. Many others, particularly Latin Americans worried about his anti-migrant campaign pledges, expressed concern over potentially rash geopolitical decision-making that might earn him political points but that could upend their lives.

Whitney Eulich
Yojani, a Venezuelan mother, poses with her children Yorjannis (left) and Yorjan (right) near the tent camp where they've been living for months in Mexico City. She and her husband are contemplating a return to South America amid the end of legal pathways and growing anti-immigrant rhetoric from the Trump administration in the U.S.

Yojani’s fears turned into reality on Jan. 20. 

Today she’s still sleeping in a tent camp outside a Mexico City church along with families who have also waited for months – some for more than a year – for a chance to ask for asylum in the U.S.

They were almost all seeking an appointment with immigration officials through the country’s now-defunct CBP One app. CBP One, though imperfect, was one of the last formal pathways to meeting with officials to request parole or asylum at the U.S. southern border. The app’s abrupt end two weeks ago was the first tangible evidence of a nation turning its back on refugees under this administration. 

Yojani refreshed the CBP One app five times that day before crumbling into a heap of tears. 

“Trump’s proposals may work in the short run” to drive immigrants out of and away from the U.S., says Brad Jones, a professor at the Global Migration Center at the University of California, Davis. But there will be long-term costs, he says, such as the U.S. losing its international “reputation as a beacon of liberty and safety.” And historians have already learned from the past “that drastic and restrictive immigration policies” only end up making it harder, pricier, or more dangerous for people to leave home – not impossible.

“The reasons people are fleeing aren’t going to go away,” Dr. Jones says.

For now, Yojani’s family is turning its gaze southward. Her husband went to the Colombian Embassy in Mexico City in late January to ask about the possibility of being repatriated there. Their daughter, age 2, is a Colombian citizen, something they hoped would qualify them for a flight there. He was turned away.

Fernando Llano/AP
A Venezuelan migrant wakes up at a migrant tent camp outside La Soledad church in Mexico City, Jan. 20, 2025, the inauguration day of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, whose unfounded claims of winning reelection last summer served as the final impetus pushing Yojani’s family out of a country where lawlessness and poverty have soared, has not been accepting any deportation flights. President Trump announced over the weekend that Mr. Maduro would start accepting migrants home, but Venezuela has not confirmed the reversal. 

Yojani now plans to find a bus to Costa Rica and try to get to Colombia from there.

Not every migrant in Mexico is deciding to give up on an American dream. They insist they will make it to the U.S. no matter what President Trump does or says. Hannah Postel, assistant professor of public policy at Duke University, says Americans could soon find out that labor shortages, typically filled by lower-wage immigrants now shut out of the U.S., could drive up costs. 

As the U.S. has turned its back on migrants, Yojani is turning her back, literally, on America as she prepares a reverse, southward journey. “I feel like my wings have been clipped,” she says. But, she adds, it’s not the end of her story – being a mother necessitates walking the path ahead, wherever that may lead.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to This Venezuelan mother hoped for asylum in the US. Now she is turning southward.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2025/0205/Trump-migrants-Venezuela-Mexico-asylum
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe