Farmers are razing the Amazon. Brazil says they’re also the solution.

Farmers are a key part of Brazilian President Lula’s plan to address deforestation in the Amazon – even as farmers continue to turn wide swathes of forest into farmland.

|
Bruno Kelly/Reuters/File
A view shows a deforested area in the middle of the Amazon Forest near the BR-230 highway, known as Transamazonica, in the municipality of Uruara, Para, Brazil, July 14, 2021.

Plans by Brazilian President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva to revive vast swaths of degraded pasture are key to his push to protect Brazil’s Amazon without alienating farmers, but questions remain – including whether they will agree to stop clearing trees on their land.

During COP28 in Dubai, the leftist president detailed the proposals to ease pressure on Brazil’s forests by regenerating up to 99 million acres of depleted grazing land – an area roughly the size of Sweden – within a decade.

“We want to convince the people who invest in agriculture ... that it is completely viable to keep the forest standing and [still] have land to plant whatever we want,” Mr. Lula told reporters at the United Nations climate conference, which ended on Dec. 13 with a deal to transition away from fossil fuels.

The launch of the plan coincides with efforts by the agricultural powerhouse to improve its environment record as the country braces for new European Union regulations banning deforestation-linked commodities.

Brazil is one of the world’s biggest beef exporters, with more cattle than people, and in the Amazon, 86% of the areas deforested between 1985 and 2020 became pastures, according to an analysis from environmental nonprofit Imazon.

Nationwide, pastures cover about 395 million acres, but 63% of them are degraded, according to data cited by the government, severely limiting the land’s productivity, whether for ranching or grains farming.

That creates an incentive for farmers to clear new areas through deforestation in endangered biomes including the Amazon and the Cerrado tropical savanna.

The new plan seeks to make buying or leasing degraded land a more attractive proposition instead, and coincides with Mr. Lula’s efforts to improve ties with the powerful agribusiness sector.

Farm industry backers control 374 of Brazil’s 511 congressional seats, and Congress has been voting over the last couple of decades to make more room for private farmland over forest land.

Mr. Lula took office this year with promises to reverse the surge in deforestation that took place during the government of his predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro, who was supported by the farm lobby, and data indicates he has had some success.

Deforestation in the Amazon dropped 22.3% in the 12 months ending July 2023 year-on-year, reaching the lowest level since 2018 – when Mr. Bolsonaro was elected, according to official data. Still, in the Cerrado, deforestation rose 3% over the same period.

Forest code

Launched in a decree last week, the pasture plan could be central to more sustained progress to fight deforestation because it aims to keep the country’s farmers happy by giving them an incentive to boost output on existing farmland.

Under the regeneration push, farmers would be encouraged to invest subsidized loans in either improving pasture productivity or converting pasture into cropland, making use of sustainable techniques such as soil recovery, no-till farming, use of more nature-friendly fertilizers, and pesticides.

Brazil’s Parliamentary Agricultural Front (FPA) welcomed the program’s launch, saying that if implemented effectively it could be a “significant tool in the promotion of sustainability” in farming.

Nelson Ananias Filho, sustainability coordinator with the Brazilian Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock, said farmers were ready “to give their contribution to this ambitious target.”

Crucially, however, the program also stipulates that farmers should not increase their carbon emissions by changing land use within 10 years of joining the program.

That could be a sticking point because farmers are legally allowed to clear trees on private land under the terms of the 2012 Forest Code, which was pushed through by agribusiness backers in Congress.

The regulations require natural vegetation to be retained on only a portion of privately owned rural land, and expanded the area that can be legally cleared.

“We need to promote initiatives to fight illegal deforestation, but at the same time guarantee deforestation [that occurs] under the law, as predicted by the Forest Code,” Mr. Filho told Context.

Another possible hurdle for the pasture recovery plan is the hefty price tag – much of which the government hopes major importers of Brazilian food will finance.

Agriculture Ministry studies estimate it could cost an average of $1,500 to $3,000 per hectare, meaning the price tag for 40 million hectares could be as much as $120 billion.

Brazil already offers credit lines for farmers to convert degraded pastures into more productive crop fields, but that currently accounts for just 2% of Brazil’s subsidized farm credits – about $1.2 billion.

In addition to funding already available in Brazil, the government says Japan, South Korea, China, and Saudi Arabia have shown interest in backing investments in regenerative farming.

“We want the world to put green, soft loans [into the program],” said Carlos Augustin, special advisor to Brazilian Agriculture Minister Carlos Favaro.

“Countries want sustainability, to contribute with the fight against climate change, and we are offering all this: more food, without deforestation,” he said, adding that the exact terms of potential investment in the program were still being negotiated.

The program’s decree says resources could also come from existing sources, which environmental advocates said could be an opportunity to redirect subsidized government loans to cattle ranchers and soy farmers in Amazon states.

“Independently from raising more money, you must make better use from the money that already exists,” said Paulo Barreto, a researcher at Imazon.

Other challenges include ensuring technical experts are on-hand in remote areas, said Patricia Menezes, a researcher at the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), which will provide technical support to the program.

“It’s a very big country, with very unequal degrees of development. There are regions where those with expertise do not want to live,” she said.

Reforestation

Brazil also launched an Amazon restoration project at COP28, which will help finance reforestation in the “arc of deforestation” that spans the Amazon forest’s southern and eastern fringes, with state development bank BNDES announcing initial funding of $200 million.

Brazil’s forest and farmland restoration initiatives go hand-in-hand, said Fabiola Zerbini, director of Brazil’s Department of Forests within the environment ministry.

Restoring natural areas is vital for replenishing water basins – a key step in pasture regeneration, she said.

Ultimately, Mr. Barreto said, the success of the pasture regeneration plan hinges on making the proposition a better business opportunity for farmers than deforestation.

To help tip the balance, he said the government should improve tracing systems that allow buyers to avoid products from areas that have been newly deforested – whether legally or illegally, he said.

“If it’s too easy to deforest, people will prefer to do that than invest in [land regeneration] technology,” he said.

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Farmers are razing the Amazon. Brazil says they’re also the solution.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2023/1214/Farmers-are-razing-the-Amazon.-Brazil-says-they-re-also-the-solution
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us