Double standard emerges in Brazil van gang rape investigation

The American victim of a Brazil gang rape saw two suspects arrested in her case within 24 hours. The same men allegedly raped a local woman a week prior, but her case saw little action from police.

|
Felipe Dana / AP
Suspects (l. - r.) Wallace Aparecido Souza Silva, Carlos Armando Costa dos Santos, and Jonathan Foudakis de Souza have been charged with attacking tourists in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 2. An American woman was gang raped and beaten aboard a public transport van while her French boyfriend was shackled, hit with a crowbar, and forced to watch the attacks, police said.

When two foreigners reported on early Saturday morning that they had been held hostage for nearly six hours in a van the night before – while the drivers gang-raped the young American woman and beat her French male companion with an iron bar – the Tourist Police rushed into action.

Using transaction records from their stolen credit cards and security footage from a gas station camera, the police quickly put together a list of suspects, two of whom were arrested by the end of the day. Their rapid response was widely praised in Brazil and abroad.

But after a local woman came forward to say she too had reported to police her attack and rape by the same men – the week before – observers began questioning the seeming bias in investigations into two nearly identical cases.

Rio de Janeiro is in a rush to revamp its image as a crime-ridden city ahead of a series of international mega-events, including the World Youth Day visit by the pope this July, the World Cup next year, and the 2016 Summer Olympics. The city has seen many progressive initiatives, one of the most noticeable being the installation of “Pacifying Police Units” – police trained in human rights and conflict mediation – in favelas (squatter settlements) once controlled by drug traffickers.

“I think it is precisely due to the touristic aspect [of the foreigner’s rape case] that the police mobilized the investigation and that it was successful so quickly,” says Barbara Soares, a sociologist at the Rio de Janeiro university Cândido Mendes and previously the Rio de Janeiro state undersecretary for women’s security.

Ms. Soares says Brazil has made great strides in both legislation and societal attitudes toward victims of rape since the time she was in the state agency a decade ago. Back then, she says, police attendants would ask a woman reporting sexual violence if the aggressor was her boyfriend to cast doubt on her claim, and gynecological equipment at the hospital to inspect and treat rape victims was rusty.

But the response to the young Brazilian alleged rape victim still shows the holes in law enforcement’s response. She reported the rape a week before the foreigners to a police unit specialized in crimes against women. After she came forward to a local television crew to give an interview about her experience and say she recognized her rapists as the suspects in the case of the foreign couple, the head of Rio’s civil police, Martha Rocha, fired the police chief and forensic technician – both women – responsible in the Brazilian’s case, accusing them of negligence.

Ms. Rocha said in a statement that she “was sorry about the services delivered [to the Brazilian victim] and laments that the management of the two organs involved [in her investigation] were under the responsibility of women, precisely those who should be most sensitive to episodes like this.”

Mauricio Santoro, a human rights researcher with the Brazilian branch of Amnesty International, says he was “distressed” by how much Brazilian media coverage of the foreign couple’s ordeal has focused on the impact it has on the city’s image and tourism. Rio may be taking cues from the aftermath of a recent and similar incident in India. After the high-profile gang rape on a bus there, followed by a handful of similar attacks, the number of female tourists has declined in India by 35 percent, with tourism overall dropping by 25 percent over the past three months, according to a survey the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India.

“Of course it will have an economic effect for tourism and the city, but the most serious concern should be the rights of women in the city," says Mr. Santoro. "Whether they are foreign or are Brazilian is secondary.” Santoro says he hopes Brazilians mobilize against sexual violence in the same way Indian protesters did, but says he had yet to see signs of that.

The state of Rio de Janeiro, which had a population of 16 million in the 2010 census, registers 16 cases of rape a day, says Santoro, which is in part due to a greater reporting and a wider definition of rape.

The recent case of a star soccer goalkeeper found guilty of murdering his ex-girlfriend (with an ex-policeman servicing as an accomplice) garnered wide media attention and showed a positive changing tide of attitudes toward gender violence, Santoro adds.

“They were very important cases with good decisions and harsh sentences. I think the mindsets [are] changing and the legislation is changing, but this is not enough. We still have a problem of police negligence and police not investigating enough,” he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Double standard emerges in Brazil van gang rape investigation
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2013/0402/Double-standard-emerges-in-Brazil-van-gang-rape-investigation
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe