Skip to footer

Pistorius lawyers fail in attempt to block appeal

The ruling means Pistorius' case looks set to go to South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal.

|
Kim Ludbrook/REUTERS
Prosecutor Gerrie Nel speaks in court during a bid by Oscar Pistorius's defense team to challenge the prosecution's right to appeal the culpable homicide verdict handed down to Pistorius in 2014, in the Johannesburg High Court, March 13, 2015.
  • By Associated Press

| Johannesburg

Oscar Pistorius' lawyers failed Friday in their attempt to stop an appeal by prosecutors that will again seek a murder conviction against the double-amputee athlete for shooting girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.

Judge Thokozile Masipa dismissed an application by Pistorius' defense lawyers to challenge the appeal by prosecutors, who were last year granted permission by Masipa to have Pistorius' negligent killing conviction reviewed. Prosecutors want Pistorius found guilty of the more serious charge of murder for shooting Steenkamp multiple times through a door in a bathroom in his home in 2013.

A murder conviction would call for a minimum sentence of 15 years in jail.

The 28-year-old Pistorius is currently serving a five-year prison sentence for culpable homicide, which is comparable to manslaughter. He could be released from jail in August to serve the remainder under house arrest.

"The order that I grant in this matter is to strike off the application," the black-robed Masipa said in her ruling on Friday, dismissing the defense's application.

The ruling means Pistorius' case looks set to go to South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal, where a panel of judges would decide if Masipa's initial verdict to acquit Pistorius of murder at the end of the seven-month trial last year was wrong.

In December, Masipa granted prosecutors permission to take the case to the Supreme Court of Appeal and challenge her own ruling. Pistorius' lawyers were arguing Friday that Masipa should not have allowed the appeal.

Masipa made her latest ruling after a short court session in Johannesburg. Pistorius' trial was held in another courthouse in the capital Pretoria. The Olympian and multiple Paralympic champion is in a Pretoria prison and did not attend Friday's proceedings. There were also no members of his or Steenkamp's family present.

Masipa heard arguments by Barry Roux, Pistorius' chief defense lawyer at trial, and Gerrie Nel, the chief prosecutor.

Roux argued prosecutors had "mistakenly" been given permission to appeal. Nel said there was no basis for this application by Pistorius' defense, which wanted a "never-ending case" to prevent it from going to the appeal court.

The Supreme Court of Appeal sits in the central city of Bloemfontein. No date has been given for the appeal but cases can sometimes take two years to reach the court, legal experts say.

The mother of Pistorius' slain girlfriend, who attended much of last year's trial, said this week that she was not interested in the appeal.

"How is it going to help me?" June Steenkamp said, adding "my daughter died. Horribly."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Pistorius lawyers fail in attempt to block appeal
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2015/0313/Pistorius-lawyers-fail-in-attempt-to-block-appeal
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe