Without Mandela, can the African National Congress still liberate the nation?

New Year's irresolution: With deep ideological divides and mired in accusations of cronyism, the ANC ideal of a 'free, united and prosperous people' seems dimmer. 

|
Guy Tillin / AFP
A Nelson Mandela moment: ANC supporters of Mandela listen to party leaders in Bisho, Ciskei, South Africa, Feb. 27, 1994.

The nation of South Africa now faces for the first time a new year without Nelson Mandela

When Mr. Mandela and the African National Congress ascended to power in 1994, the two names were inextricably wed to each other and exemplified the ideals of fairness, inclusiveness and triumph against adversity.

But the glow, at least, surrounding the Rainbow Nation ideals championed by Mandela, has faded. With his passing, the ANC political party now running South Africa -- the liberation movement Mandela was once synonymous with -- is found wanting.

There is a widely felt sense that things with the ANC are not just unfinished, but left half-finished. With crime still unsolved, with greater gaps between rich and poor, with spirits often flagging, and without an inspiring new ANC leader, the question remains whether Africa's oldest liberation movement can remain an effective force, or even remain in power. At Mandela's funeral in Soweto, current President Jacob Zuma was booed, when his face came on screen. 

Mandela preserved his own heroic status when he stepped down from the presidency and the limelight. True, there were public problems: the prosecution of his former wife Winnie, news of his early womanizing, and some questionable behavior of his relatives. But none of these diminished his central achievements.  

Yet from the moment the ANC and Mandela began to decouple, the ANC's stock began to fall – and none of its politicians could hold the various factions together.

While Mandela's passing on Dec. 5 is unlikely to mean the end of the ANC, the party does face compounding problems. Today, deeply divided between varying ideologies and mired in accusations of corruption and cronyism, the ANC's vision of a "free, united and prosperous people" appears foggier and more distant. 

Mamphela Ramphele, a scholar and former girlfriend of "Black Consciousness Movement" founder Steve Biko, argues that. "People feel forgotten, that their voices don't count. They feel disrespected and they say: 'In the past we were poor but we had hope. Now we have lost hope.'"

Ms. Ramphele, who started her own party, Agang, to prevent what she feels will be a steady decline of Mandela's dream, adds that, "People feel that it's time for a change, they can no longer keep waiting."

The ANC track record

To be sure, the ANC-led government has had successes: It has helped more children get into school, cut crime, maintained economic growth, provided drugs for HIV, and dismantled the injustices of apartheid.

It also notched a rare achievement for a former liberation movement: It was democratically elected four times, behind three different presidents. And, contrary to all expectations, the ANC helped successfully host the 2010 Fifa Soccer World Cup. And shortly after its most recent election victory in 2009, it hosted a successful UN climate change summit.  

But too many South Africans have seen no change in their lives since 1994. Some one fifth of the population lives on about $1.50 or less per day.

As Richard Dowden, director of the Royal African Society, put it: "South Africa is now an archipelago of fortified islands of luxury, in a sea of poverty."

Nowhere was that inequality more starkly defined than at the ANC's centenary celebrations in the Free State city of Bloemfontein in January 2012. The old socialist liberation movement began the weekend's festivities with a $3400 per head golf tournament, and ended the good times in a stadium where senior politicians quaffed champagne and ate birthday cake as thousands of impoverished people looked on.

Today, South Africa's schools are viewed as among the worst in the world. Half of youth between 18 and 24 are in neither education, employment or training, making up what is being called a "lost generation" that will never pay the taxes needed to fund a growing social security bill.

Health departments are blighted by a lack of basic resources. In rural areas there are chronic shortages of doctors, and in some areas, crime goes unpunished because the local police chief is in the pay of the township gang lord.

Those who can afford to simply opt-out will pay the coin for private security firms, private health care, and private schooling for their children.

But those who cannot isolate themselves are becoming increasingly angry. They are listening to the dog-whistle politics of people like Julius Malema, the erstwhile and now ejected ANC youth leader, who has advocated for the nationalization of mines, and for Zimbabwe-style land seizures.

Cronyism

Many analysts say it is the system by which loyal party men are given jobs in government – regardless of their ability – that is behind many of South Africa's ills. Patric Mtshaulana, a lawyer and former political instructor for ANC fighters living in exile in Mozambique, believes that such handouts can lead to mismanagement and corruption.

"Some of these people left the country at a very early age and were staying in camps where they were taken care of like children and had everything supplied for them," Mr. Mtshaulana says. "They go from nothing to suddenly handling a budget of millions."

Others, he adds, had an "our-turn-to-eat" mentality. "Now [that] they are back home, they feel their struggle should not have been without reward."

One close South African observer, Heidi Holland, writes in her recent "100 Years of Struggle: Mandela's ANC," that the difficulty has always been one of unreasonably high expectations for a movement that was never perfect, even in exile. 

"When Mandela came to power, there was a simplistic and idealized view of the ANC," she says. "What one has seen over the last 18 years is the steady erosion of that mythology. And South Africans are inevitably disappointed." 

Political commentator Allister Sparks says that ANC leaders such as President Zuma are distracted from running the country by the battle to maintain cohesion among alliance partners who, without a common goal such as fighting apartheid, are squabbling.

"A stronger leader, as Mandela was, could give clear leadership and objectivity and because of his stature in the movement, the country and the world, people listened," Mr. Sparks says.

Currently, as rival parties such as the Democratic Alliance and Agang gain in strength, and the ANC's apartheid-era support base dies off to be replaced by voters with shorter memories, the monolithic ANC may even be forced to relinquish power.

"The ANC will become beatable, just as [Ghana's Kwame] Nkruma's and [Kenya's founding father Jomo] Kenyatta's parties became beatable," Sparks says. "There will be no dramatic collapse but fragments will fly off."

Search for a new Mandela

Against such a backdrop, the ANC could be forgiven for casting around for a new Mandela, or someone like him. 

Winnie Mandela has suggested that role be filled by Mr. Malema, the former youth leader, who she compares to her former husband in his early, outspoken days.

Another name on many lips is Cyril Ramaphosa, the anti-apartheid activist-turned-business tycoon. He was elected as Zuma's ANC deputy president last year after his predecessor Kgalema Motlanthe launched, and lost, a leadership challenge.

Mr. Ramaphosa, a respected and liked politician who led ANC negotiations to end apartheid, was Mandela's nominated successor when he stepped down in 1999. But the ANC chose Thabo Mbeki instead.

Sparks believes Mr. Motlanthe, who remains the country's deputy president despite his removal from the ANC post, would make a "solid, practical leader."

Among the Mandelas themselves, there are few contenders. Mandla Mandela, the former president's grandson, is an ANC MP. But he has been tarnished by scandals like an acrimonious marriage breakup and accusations of land seizures.

Ndileka Mandela, the oldest grandchild of the clan, says it is no coincidence that there were so few Mandelas in politics. 

"For us to be in politics would be a double-edged sword because everyone would expect you to be like Granddad, to be as strong as he was, and compare you to him," she says. 

Tukwini Mandela, her cousin, argues that even Mandela himself could not help South Africa now. 

"Granddad's purpose was to lay the foundations. The onus is on us to build strong houses," she says. "It's the responsibility of the ANC and all South Africans. If the ANC is doomed, we should all be blamed." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Without Mandela, can the African National Congress still liberate the nation?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2014/0101/Without-Mandela-can-the-African-National-Congress-still-liberate-the-nation
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe