Trump hollows out USAID. Who will miss it most?

|
Ben Curtis/AP/File
A woman stands by USAID-provided sacks of wheat in the Tigray region of Ethiopia, May 8, 2021.

When Donald Trump took office as president on Jan. 20, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was the world’s largest foreign aid organization, with a staff of more than 10,000 people and an annual budget of around $40 billion. 

At the stroke of midnight Saturday, it will effectively cease to exist, at least for now. All but around 300 of its staff have been placed on “administrative leave,” and employees posted overseas have been ordered to return to the United States within 30 days. The move caps nearly three weeks of efforts by the Trump administration to dismantle America’s foreign aid infrastructure, which the president and his advisors argue is bloated, inefficient, and out of step with American values. 

The administration is “feeding USAID into the woodchipper,” boasted Trump advisor Elon Musk in a Feb. 3 post on his social platform X. 

SOURCE:

ForeignAssistance.gov

|
Jacob Turcotte/Staff

Why We Wrote This

The Trump administration is moving to close down USAID, the biggest foreign aid organization in the world. Where does American aid go, how much does it cost, and who benefits from it?

USAID’s rapid evisceration began with an executive order Mr. Trump signed on his first day in office, pausing all American foreign aid for 90 days. Then Mr. Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency – which despite its name, is not an actual federal department – moved in.

Meanwhile, around the world, U.S.-funded aid projects ground to halt. A migrant shelter in Mexico fired its doctor, social worker, and child psychologist. A community organization in Zimbabwe stopped an outreach program to keep girls in school and out of child marriages. A helpline for veterans and their families in Ukraine abruptly disconnected. An independent investigative media outlet in Bosnia fired a reporter. Lifesaving medicines were trapped in a Sudanese port, with no way of transporting them to their destinations across the war-stricken country.

Jacob Turcotte and Ryan Lenora Brown/Staff

A few USAID-funded projects have now received an “emergency humanitarian waiver” to continue operations, though it remains unclear to many whether they qualify. At the same time, two trade unions representing USAID workers have filed a suit against the government, arguing the jettisoning of the organization's staff and projects is unconstitutional. 

For his part, Mr. Trump has promised that the upheaval at USAID will not spell a total end to U.S. foreign assistance.

Rather, he says he wants to reform the agency. In that, he may find popular support. Polls have shown a majority of Americans believe the country spends too much on foreign aid (although they also believe it makes up a quarter of the U.S. budget, when in fact it accounts for less than 1%). 

Still, many argue American aid isn’t just a bleeding heart, do-gooder project of “radical left lunatics,” as Mr. Trump recently claimed, but a vital element in maintaining support for the U.S. around the world. 

“What I want to just express to the American people is that USAID and the work that they’re doing, it’s not charity,” said Senator Andy Kim, D-N.J., in an interview with Slate this week. “This isn’t American altruism. This is something that is so vital to our national security.” 

SOURCE:

United Nations, ForeignAssistance.gov

|
Jacob Turcotte/Staff
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump hollows out USAID. Who will miss it most?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2025/0207/trump-usaid-doge-foreign-aid
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe