Skip to footer

Why did US remove Cuba, Malaysia from human trafficking blacklist?

The United States upgraded Cuba and Malaysia on its annual ranking of nations in the global fight against human trafficking, but critics say the moves are motivated purely by politics.

|
Andrew Harnik/AP
Secretary of State John Kerry, accompanied by '2015 Trafficking in Persons Report heroes' whose efforts have made an impact on the global fight against modern slavery, speaks during a news conference at the State Departmebt in Washington, on Monday, where he released the 2015 Trafficking in Persons Report. The State Department has taken Malaysia and Cuba off its blacklist of countries failing to combat modern-day slavery, leaving the US open to criticism that politics is swaying the often-contentious rankings in its annual human trafficking report.

The US State Department upgraded Malaysia and Cuba Monday in its formal ranking of world nations’ efforts to combat modern-day slavery, but the decision has led to criticisms of political favoritism that cast doubt on the integrity of the rankings.

The US has been steadily improving political ties with communist Cuba after 50 years of frigid relations. Critics also argue that Malaysia’s upgrade is related to its involvement in a US-backed trade agreement among Pacific Rim countries.

John Kerry, the US secretary of State, formally launched the annual US assessment – the Trafficking in Persons report – which analyzes and ranks how 188 governments around the world have invested in fighting human trafficking and other forms of exploitative labor.

Cuba had been held on the lowest ranking, “tier 3,” for years amid allegations of coerced labor with Cuban government work missions overseas. The upgrade comes just a week after the United States and Cuba restored formal diplomatic relations for the first time since the Kennedy administration. The US also recently took Cuba off its list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Under Secretary of State Sarah Sewall denied that political considerations had come into play in the rankings, noting that Cuba was still on tier 2 of the rankings and, while it has made progress in addressing sex trafficking, it has so far failed to address the problem of forced labor.

Malaysia was another contentious upgrade on the list. The country was downgraded with Thailand last year because of pervasive labor abuses in its lucrative fishing industry. While Malaysia was upgraded this year, Thailand was not. Thailand is not part of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the proposed Pacific Rim trade agreement that is a key part of President Obama’s Asia policy.

There are 12 nations, including Malaysia, in the partnership. The nations are meeting in Hawaii this week, hoping to close the agreement after years of negotiations.

Both Thailand and Malaysia have faced intense international criticism over the trafficking of stateless Rohingya Muslins from Myanmar and Bangladesh aboard overcrowded boats. Dozens of graves have been found in abandoned jungle camps on both sides of the Thai-Malaysian border.

A bipartisan group of US Senators wrote Secretary Kerry earlier this month, saying that “a premature upgrade of Malaysia would undermine the integrity of the TIP report process and undermine our efforts to fight human trafficking."

Ms. Sewall cited the strengthening of Malaysia’s anti-trafficking law and the increase in the number of trafficking investigations and prosecutions in the period covered by the report. The reporting period ended March 31, almost two months before the discovery of mass graves in Malaysia.

Malaysia, she added, still has “much room for improvement.”

Melysa Sperber, director of the Alliance to End Slavery and Trafficking, said that by upgrading Malaysia, the US is “selling out victims of human trafficking,” according to NBC News.

“It also undermines the integrity of the report and jeopardizes the credibility that has been built up over many years,” she added.

The TIP report is one of several annual assessments issued by the State Department on human rights-related issues, but to actually rank nations is unusual and it can often create minor diplomatic controversies.

The Thai Embassy in Washington “strongly disagreed” with its retention on tier 3. In a statement the embassy said the evaluation “does not accurately reflect the reality and fails to take into account significant efforts undertaken by the Thai Government on all fronts during the past year.”

The TIP rankings are even more serious in that a spot on tier 3 gives the US government the right to enact sanctions on that country, including withdrawing US support for loans from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. President Obama now has 90 days to determine if the US will do so, though it is rare that the US ever does pursue such sanctions. Politico also reported that if Malaysia had stayed on tier 3 it could have faced US legal hurdles to its involvement in the TPP deal.

Uzbekistan was also promoted to tier 2 after two years on tier 3, along with Saudi Arabia, Papua New Guinea and the Democratic Republic of Congo. There are now 23 nations on tier 3, including Iran, Libya, North Korea, Russia, Syria, and Zimbabwe.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Why did US remove Cuba, Malaysia from human trafficking blacklist?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0727/Why-did-US-remove-Cuba-Malaysia-from-human-trafficking-blacklist
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe